| andlabs Member Level: 38 ![]() Posts: 242/309 EXP: 361101 For next: 9346 Since: 03-19-10 From: United States Since last post: 1.1 years Last activity: 129 days |
|
||
| I have had a poor experience with Mint. The only distribution that actually works for me without serious issues is regular Ubuntu, or any of the official variants (Kubuntu, Ubuntu GNOME, etc.). The only main difference between the variants is what desktop environment they use, and in the end which one to go with is up to you. However, there are a good number of people who have not been very lucky with Ubuntu, so what will happen with you is unpredictable. Debian is not necessarily non-modern; the stable releases are designed to be as dependable as possible and thus sacrifice the bleeding edge for reliability, but they aren't relics by any means. Ubuntu itself is based on Debian testing, which is far more up to date. However, Debian does require some amount of user configuration; I don't know how much, but it's still some good amount. Other distributions that don't require too much setup are Fedora and OpenSUSE; while Fedora has mostly worked for me OpenSUSE has always felt wonky. Again, your results WILL vary. You should definitely decide which desktop environment you want to use as part of your decision on which distribution to use. The big four (GNOME 3, KDE 4, Xfce, and Unity) are wildly different. Try a live CD or live USB of the various Ubuntu flavors (which each differ by which DE they come with) to get a taste. If those four aren't good enough, there are more obscure alternatives (LXDE, window manager-only setups like Openbox and IceWM, etc.), but let's only turn to those when you rule out the big four. |



