|
Xkeeper Level: 263 ![]() Posts: 21844/25343 EXP: 296639743 For next: 2320710 Since: 07-03-07 Pronouns: they/them/???????? Since last post: 6 days Last activity: 7 hours |
|
I think the fundamental issue at the heart of my thoughts is a loss of a space like "LiveJournal".
LiveJournal in its heyday had individual journals and "communities". You could set privacy levels for posts on both, from either "only self", "everyone", or "friends", or "members of the community" — only those people would be able to view and comment. Communities, too, could either be public or invite-only. Later on, you actually could create "groups" too, which would allow visibility only to friends in a group you made. I feel like this is the nostalgic sharing method I have been wanting. Rather than the "all visible", or "only super visible" type, stuff controllable at a community level. So you could have, say, a public all-joinable TCRF group, a private invite-only "vent station", and individual allowances for who could see your own threads (if you wanted). Today's social media is very different to this, usually either "all visible always", or "nothing but friends visible". Twitter is especially egregious because if someone public replies to a private account, anyone can still see the replies; in this case only people who could see the original post could reply or view other replies... (Maybe even comments could have subset limiters, e.g. "mutual friends only"?) Hmm :/ ____________________ (Testing: 21844 posts, level 230, 187309271 EXP) |















