| ReiNi さよなら*へヴン Level: 124 ![]() Posts: 4018/4444 EXP: 21750888 For next: 85713 Since: 07-21-07 Since last post: 6.7 years Last activity: 3.3 years |
|
||
|
![]() Register - Login |
||
| Main - Memberlist - Active users - Calendar - Wiki - IRC Chat - Online users Ranks - Rules/FAQ - Stats - Latest Posts - Color Chart - Smilies |
||
| Jul - The Cutting Room Floor - TCRF and...nudity | - - ![]() |
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Next newer thread | Next older thread |
| ReiNi さよなら*へヴン Level: 124 ![]() Posts: 4018/4444 EXP: 21750888 For next: 85713 Since: 07-21-07 Since last post: 6.7 years Last activity: 3.3 years |
|
||
|
| devin Yoshi i'm mima irl Level: 112 ![]() Posts: 2509/3519 EXP: 14918702 For next: 419503 Since: 04-29-08 Pronouns: any From: FL Since last post: 297 days Last activity: 1 day |
|
||
|
"The tcrf.net lawyer has informed us that we need a warning! So.. if you are under the age of 18 or find this photograph offensive, please don't look at it. Thank you!"
____________________ Photo by Luc Viatour • go to it |
| Rick M'Lord, there's a knife in your head! Level: 152 ![]() Posts: 5693/7539 EXP: 43668632 For next: 633028 Since: 02-15-10 From: Maine Since last post: 113 days Last activity: 45 days |
|
||
| If the image really warrants a lot of NSFW, could just do what was done with the GTA: San Andreas pic of the Hot Coffee thing. ____________________ _______________________ | 5693 | 14307 | 755 | 19 | |
GlitterBerri![]() Translator Level: 39 ![]() Posts: 276/339 EXP: 403693 For next: 1078 Since: 11-10-10 Since last post: 6.6 years Last activity: 1.2 years |
|
||
| But that's censorship, and I'd be curious to see what the offending content was. |
| GoldS Member Level: 41 ![]() Posts: 240/372 EXP: 477150 For next: 2995 Since: 03-15-10 Since last post: 2.1 years Last activity: 13 days |
|
||
| I guess it'd be okay if the censored image was a clickable link to the real image. ____________________ |
| Keitaro Fire Snake LOVELY ARRANGEMENT. VOLCANO BAKEMEAT Level: 70 Posts: 1084/1191 EXP: 2898885 For next: 116926 Since: 09-09-08 From: California Since last post: 4.1 years Last activity: 3.8 years |
|
||
Originally posted by Kazinsal this seems like the most practical solution so far, honestly
|
| ReiNi さよなら*へヴン Level: 124 ![]() Posts: 4019/4444 EXP: 21750888 For next: 85713 Since: 07-21-07 Since last post: 6.7 years Last activity: 3.3 years |
|
||
Nicole![]() Disk-kun Level: 146 ![]() Posts: 5847/6469 EXP: 38252672 For next: 260622 Since: 07-07-07 Pronouns: she/her From: Boston, MA Since last post: 69 days Last activity: 1 day |
|
||
|
| Xkeeper Level: 263 ![]() Posts: 19999/25343 EXP: 296716419 For next: 2244034 Since: 07-03-07 Pronouns: they/them/???????? Since last post: 9 days Last activity: 3 days |
|
||
| Why aren't se just putting a box at the top with "NSFW content below"? ____________________ |
| legacyme3 "In short, legacyme3 does horrible things to people, and I don't think anyone else on Jul should be exposed to him, no matter how decent of a person he pretends to be." I don't normally ban for offsite behavior but you're a whole level of terrible. Level: NaN ![]() Posts: 1334/-1694 EXP: NaN For next: 0 Since: 06-01-11 Since last post: 8.9 years Last activity: 3.7 years |
|
||
| Kazinsal Level: 53 ![]() Posts: 197/674 EXP: 1122212 For next: 34907 Since: 01-19-11 Pronouns: he/him From: Vancouver, Canada Since last post: 232 days Last activity: 191 days |
|
||
| It would work. I don't see a problem with it. So why not? ____________________ Tears fall from the shameless Shelter me, guide me to the edge of the water Selfless are the righteous Burden me, lead me like a lamb to the slaughter |
| Nksor Beezo Level: 46 ![]() Posts: 417/478 EXP: 662202 For next: 49572 Since: 04-27-11 Pronouns: they/them From: olympia, wa Since last post: 3.6 years Last activity: 3.6 years |
|
||
| I've bounced this idea around my idea more times than there are stars in the sky and I think that, after serious consideration, I've come to a position on this topic. Putting any of these "NSFW tag" ideas into effect would mark an extremely tragic turn for TCRF. I'll try to detail why it's such a bad idea in the paragraphs below. Doing this would be drawing a line where no line should be drawn. What would be "too NSFW," or at least explicit enough to waiver the little box? Would doing this encourage people to search for explicit stuff in games, and dump it all on TCRF? I'm not saying that this kind of content is a bad idea; rather, any content is positive content; but can you imagine what several pages bearing NSFW tags, boxes, etc everywhere would look like? It'd make us look more like a hub for hidden video game smut more than anything else. Upon plastering pages with "NSFW", the administrators would more than likely screen for things that would be considered too explicit - and where would you draw the line there? Are we going to start putting boxes on every page that has the word "fuck" on it? Are we simply going to "turn down" people who have content that the admins don't consider "proper" enough to be included? You'd be alienating your audiences - and, with a wiki, your viewers are your contributors. It's a slippery slope, and everyone seems to be eager to go running head first down it. I can personally cite a conversation that took place inside of #tcrf, where a handful of people were complaining about the amount of articles based on games made with Adobe Flash. I can remember the general consensus that the majority came to, which was that in a community based resource - and in any case, really - you can't choose to act upon something, if something else is doing the exact same thing. If you're going to put a NSFW tag on one thing, well, you might as well do it on every page that includes things that are NSFW! Right? Right? Not to mention the fact that doing this would be contradicting the very ideals of the site itself, one of them being to bring censored or cut things to light. And then we turn around and censor the very content that we just "un-censored?" What? My opinion? Put the content in, as it is. Who are we really protecting? Are we protecting the kids, who, in all honestly, shouldn't be reading an article about Splatterhouse in the first place? I apologize for my strong feelings on the subject, but I felt that I needed to get out my opinions. |
| Bagel Giant Red Paratroopa without music life would Bb Level: 75 Posts: 1095/1446 EXP: 3798594 For next: 28310 Since: 03-30-09 Pronouns: he/him From: bear Since last post: 181 days Last activity: 14 days |
|
||
| sister miyagi 50 ![]() Level: 17 Posts: 44/50 EXP: 23391 For next: 1352 Since: 04-30-10 From: Illinois Since last post: 8.6 years Last activity: 340 days |
|
||
Why do people think putting NSFW warnings on pages would make people look exclusively for NSFW content to find? Why would having a NSFW template turn NSFW content into OMG HOT XXXX PRONS HERE? I agree it might be hard to define a line for what's NSFW and what's not, but if the Supreme Court knows it when they see it, I'm sure we can too ![]() Yet another suggestion: put a disclaimer on the main page saying something along the lines of "There may be boobies on some of these pages so don't browse this site at work if your boss votes Republican!" That way it's up to the individual if they ding their work's web filter or whatever. Edit: Probably should've read Bagel's post before posting mine... |
Rachel Mae![]() Creature of Chaos Level: 141 Posts: 4907/5929 EXP: 33575792 For next: 544222 Since: 07-03-07 Pronouns: she/her From: Foxglen Since last post: 12 days Last activity: 2 hours |
|
||
Originally posted by BlueWhirlI think you're being a bit paranoid. My biggest concern is people browsing the wiki at work, or in a public place, or with other family members around, unaware that such content even exists. I don't want anyone getting in trouble, and a NSFW tag is just common courtesy in many places on the Internet. ____________________ |
| Nksor Beezo Level: 46 ![]() Posts: 418/478 EXP: 662202 For next: 49572 Since: 04-27-11 Pronouns: they/them From: olympia, wa Since last post: 3.6 years Last activity: 3.6 years |
|
||
| Perhaps I should clarify what I meant when I said that I didn't want "NSFW tags" on the website. Many of the ideas suggested include flashy, annoying, or otherwise bothersome warnings. Not to mention the "spoiler boxes" and the idea to open up the image in a new tab, which would seriously chop up the flow of the pages. If a warning for potential NSFW content is necessary, then it should at least fit in with the page, no? I'm seriously against censorship, or whatever you wish to call this, but I can understand people's concerns. |
| ReiNi さよなら*へヴン Level: 124 ![]() Posts: 4020/4444 EXP: 21750888 For next: 85713 Since: 07-21-07 Since last post: 6.7 years Last activity: 3.3 years |
|
||
|
| sister miyagi 50 ![]() Level: 17 Posts: 45/50 EXP: 23391 For next: 1352 Since: 04-30-10 From: Illinois Since last post: 8.6 years Last activity: 340 days |
|
||
Originally posted by BlueWhirl This isn't censorship. Censorship would be denying access to the pictures at all, either by editing them or refusing to have them on the wiki. This is just warning people they're about to see images that have nudity. Sorry but it irks me when people use that word wrong. As far as chopping up the flow of a page, I've seen other wikis use expandable galleries to house large collections of images to save bandwidth (the pictures aren't loaded until the gallery is expanded), and it doesn't chop up pages at all - it actually makes them easier to navigate because you don't have to scroll through a million images. I really feel like you're just opposed to any sort of warning at all for some reason. Anyway, it seems to have been taken care of. |
| Nksor Beezo Level: 46 ![]() Posts: 419/478 EXP: 662202 For next: 49572 Since: 04-27-11 Pronouns: they/them From: olympia, wa Since last post: 3.6 years Last activity: 3.6 years |
|
||
|
When I said "censorship" I wasn't meaning it in its most extreme form. Again, referring strictly to the ideas that would make users click things to view - you're altering the way people would see it. content [click here to view NSFW content] content The content aught to be equal with the rest, and we shouldn't be giving off the impression that certain content is better than other content. Although, I don't know how much my argument matters anymore - it looks like the banner idea is going through anyways, which would be something that I support, or at least more than the idea I mentioned above. |
RahanAkero![]() The End of the World Level: 57 Posts: 521/756 EXP: 1399510 For next: 86418 Since: 11-25-09 From: Staten Island, NY Since last post: 254 days Last activity: 16 days |
|
||
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Next newer thread | Next older thread |
| Jul - The Cutting Room Floor - TCRF and...nudity | - - ![]() |
![]() |
Acmlmboard - commit 47be4dc [2021-08-23] ©2000-2022 Acmlm, Xkeeper, Kaito Sinclaire, et al. Warning: You are using TidyHTML mode! Pages MAY and probably WILL break. To disable, click here or append 'xxx-off=1' to the URL! ![]() |
| Query execution time: | 0.085858 seconds |
| Script execution time: | 0.035965 seconds |
| Total render time: | 0.121823 seconds |