Originally posted by Drag
DRM really is getting out of hand these days. We've survived FINE without it for years, why do we need it now? Don't tell me it's because of pirates, they've been around for MUCH longer than this form of DRM.
Problems with the "DRM is necessary because of pirates

" excuse:
1) Macrovision, a form of DRM, was first employed in 1985
[1]. The Internet gained popularity in the 1990s
[2]. That means Macrovision was used at least 5 years before the Internet became popular, not to mention in 1985, computers' processing power wouldn't allow for very good video compression and Internet connection speeds wouldn't allow for the transfer of such large files in any decent amount of time. The only "piracy" this really would have prevented is the person who buys 2 VCRs and copies the tapes from one to another and distributes them, and I somehow doubt that small-scale stuff was a huge problem. (And, of course, it also meant you couldn't make backups. We've all tried to play a VHS tape fairly recently only to find it wouldn't play anymore, right?)
2) There are tons of audio CDs out there with no DRM. Possibly millions. The audio CD - with a capacity of ~700MB - has existed for decades and still exists today, in an age when everyone has an Internet connection and a CD burner, speeds of up to 2MB/s are not uncommon (transfer the ISO in ~6 minutes), and ripping tools are available all over the place, even AFAIK included with Windows (Windows Media Player, which I believe can rip to WAV). Any idiot can effortlessly copy these CDs and share them on their favourite P2P network or burn copies for their friends. Yet for
some reason 
this hasn't killed the format nor the artists/companies that use it without DRM.
____________________