sofi![]() π Level: 116 ![]() Posts: 4022/4152 EXP: 17095878 For next: 228215 Since: 02-18-11 Pronouns: she/her From: γγΎγγ£γ‘ζ Since last post: 1 day Last activity: 21 hours |
|
||
Originally posted by Kaj i don't think colorway themes are ugly per se, or at least not any more ugly than any other firefox theme. in fact, i actually use a colorway theme right bc it integrates into my theme better. but this is a reluctant compromise. in general i feel like the amount of customisation colorway offers us is a pittance compared to how much we used to have before on previous versions of firefox. wasn't this one of the reasons why firefox was special in the first place? (of course we can use pale moon, but some sites simply refuse to work properly on pale moon) about why they were a limited release, you actually were onto something; i read an interview with the designer behind the colorways rolloutβhe has a background in the fashion industryβand it is more or less as cynical as you think it is. he believes that themes are meaningless for most consumers, but having colour customisations increases engagement. he borrows the `limited edition' strategy from fashion for the same reason Taco Bell announces new items on their menu, or really anything: to generate hype. ____________________ soο¬ β» please excuse our appearance as we prepare for a new layout |

















