Register - Login
Views: 99804319
Main - Memberlist - Active users - Calendar - Wiki - IRC Chat - Online users
Ranks - Rules/FAQ - Stats - Latest Posts - Color Chart - Smilies
05-03-22 07:35:18 AM
Jul - Computers and Technology - Windows 7 - June 2009? New poll - New thread - New reply
Pages: 1 2Next newer thread | Next older thread
Tiden
Disgusting human being, just awful
Level: NaN


Posts: 2913/-6493
EXP: NaN
For next: 0

Since: 07-03-07

Pronouns: they/them

Since last post: 4.1 years
Last activity: 3.6 years

Posted on 10-28-08 04:20:31 PM (last edited by hydrapheetz at 10-28-08 04:16 PM) Link | Quote
Windows 7's interface revealed.

Sponty
Part boy, part car; Boycar, Protector and King of Chilladelphia
Level: 184


Posts: 1428/11098
EXP: 85639491
For next: 479919

Since: 08-24-07

Pronouns: he/him
From: Canada

Since last post: 6 days
Last activity: 4 days

Posted on 10-28-08 07:14:07 PM Link | Quote
Pretty spiffy.

____________________
Your spirit and my voice, in one combined. The Phantom of the Opera is there, inside your mind...
My website!
CarCat

Level: 51


Posts: 191/572
EXP: 997016
For next: 16922

Since: 10-17-07

From: LA

Since last post: 13.0 years
Last activity: 11.9 years

Posted on 10-28-08 09:44:22 PM Link | Quote

Hmm...

Looks better, but it really comes down to how it feels.


____________________
~CaR-CaT



Joe
Common spammer
🍬
Level: 111


Posts: 568/3392
EXP: 14501190
For next: 367170

Since: 08-02-07

From: Pororoca

Since last post: 12 days
Last activity: 9 hours

Posted on 10-28-08 10:52:41 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by CarCat
Looks better, but it really comes down to how it feels.
I think I know what you mean.

Like in the start menu in Vista, the button with the power icon hibernates the computer, and the program list is stuck in the menu. (Notice how both of those are different in Windows 7.)

____________________
モノ江
Monoe
Lyskar
12210
-The Chaos within trumps the Chaos without-
Level: 192


Posts: 1805/12211
EXP: 99321329
For next: 552242

Since: 07-03-07

From: 52-2-88-7

Since last post: 7.4 years
Last activity: 7.3 years

Posted on 10-29-08 06:25:27 PM Link | Quote

Time/Date

10-29-08 12:25:27pm

Posts

1805

Days Here

484

Level

60
Metal_Man88
Local Moderator
Now, to just remove the transparency effects and make it solid gray in color...

____________________
Original Layout © Tobias Kelmandia
Hiryuu

Level: 207


Posts: 5269/14435
EXP: 127622306
For next: 2161848

Since: 07-06-07


Since last post: 11.8 years
Last activity: 11.7 years

Posted on 10-29-08 08:35:16 PM Link | Quote
They been leaking betas of the 10/27 escapade yet?

____________________
roxahris
600
was seriously wounded, but the soul still burns.
Level: 52


Posts: 480/600
EXP: 1081298
For next: 2542

Since: 07-08-07

From: Somewhere.

Since last post: 9.4 years
Last activity: 8.6 years

Posted on 10-30-08 01:19:16 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by TheGreatGuy
Just compare the size and severity of the articles and the complaints in them, Vista's page is obviously much worse. Wikipedia probably has a criticism page for everything like this, doesn't mean the software in question is bad, just some people complain about something, and there is never no complaints.
You should take a look at the history of the XP criticism's page, then. You'd be surprised.

Also, the Windows 7 interface looks good... but very transparent. and thick.

____________________
Rachel Mae

Creature of Chaos
Level: 141


Posts: 1352/5929
EXP: 33604018
For next: 515996

Since: 07-03-07

Pronouns: she/her
From: Foxglen

Since last post: 21 days
Last activity: 50 min.

Posted on 10-30-08 01:30:02 AM Link | Quote
Blech.

As much as I dislike Apple, I have to give them some credit for sticking with a familiar interface for so long, instead of trying to reinvent the wheel every other release. The learning curve between XP and 7 is probably huge.

____________________

Tiden
Disgusting human being, just awful
Level: NaN


Posts: 2918/-6493
EXP: NaN
For next: 0

Since: 07-03-07

Pronouns: they/them

Since last post: 4.1 years
Last activity: 3.6 years

Posted on 10-30-08 01:33:58 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by BMF54123
Blech.

As much as I dislike Apple, I have to give them some credit for sticking with a familiar interface for so long, instead of trying to reinvent the wheel every other release. The learning curve between XP and 7 is probably huge.

Actually, what I was going to suggest is that MS really is starting to copy some of what Apple does. Just look at the taskbar: it reminds me (although barely) of the way the Mac OS X handles open applications, but not open windows. e.g., each application has just one instance in the dock but can have many windows open.
Rachel Mae

Creature of Chaos
Level: 141


Posts: 1353/5929
EXP: 33604018
For next: 515996

Since: 07-03-07

Pronouns: she/her
From: Foxglen

Since last post: 21 days
Last activity: 50 min.

Posted on 10-30-08 01:48:38 AM (last edited by BMF54123 at 10-29-08 10:53 PM) Link | Quote
I forgot to reply to this:
Originally posted by roxahris
Also, the Windows 7 interface looks good... but very transparent. and thick.
One of my biggest complaints about Vista (and the default XP skin) is that the OS takes up so much screen space. It's very distracting. I don't use my computer to ogle gigantic shiny buttons and transparent glass windows (or, as MS calls it, the "user experience"), I use it to do stuff. When the "user experience" starts distracting me, or otherwise interfering with my ability to do said stuff, there's a problem.

____________________

CarCat

Level: 51


Posts: 198/572
EXP: 997016
For next: 16922

Since: 10-17-07

From: LA

Since last post: 13.0 years
Last activity: 11.9 years

Posted on 10-30-08 02:06:14 AM Link | Quote

Have they said anything about:


*Removing all transparencies (Display setting in general.)
*Security, and how many fixes they plan to release.
*Price.
*Speed compared to Windows 3.1
*The minimum requirements?




____________________
~CaR-CaT



Hiryuu

Level: 207


Posts: 5276/14435
EXP: 127622306
For next: 2161848

Since: 07-06-07


Since last post: 11.8 years
Last activity: 11.7 years

Posted on 10-30-08 02:08:59 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by CarCat
*Speed compared to Windows 3.1


I can tell you, as an expert that's done this before, that running Windows 3.1 on a dual-core 2.2GHz processor is very fast.

It's actually rofl-fast. You have to do it once.


____________________
Sponty
Part boy, part car; Boycar, Protector and King of Chilladelphia
Level: 184


Posts: 1446/11098
EXP: 85639491
For next: 479919

Since: 08-24-07

Pronouns: he/him
From: Canada

Since last post: 6 days
Last activity: 4 days

Posted on 10-30-08 03:40:14 PM Link | Quote
You think using Virtual PC would have the same effect?

Also, I'm one for the user experience. I use my computer for gaming or web browsing, so if I have to look at the taskbar all the time, I want it to be pretty.

____________________
My website!
Hiryuu

Level: 207


Posts: 5284/14435
EXP: 127622306
For next: 2161848

Since: 07-06-07


Since last post: 11.8 years
Last activity: 11.7 years

Posted on 10-30-08 04:24:25 PM Link | Quote
I did it out of pure DOS on a 500GB SATA Seagate hard drive. :\

____________________
Xkeeper

Level: 263


Posts: 8017/25353
EXP: 297141644
For next: 1818809

Since: 07-03-07

Pronouns: they/them/????????

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 34 min.

Posted on 10-31-08 10:03:52 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by hydrapheetz
Originally posted by BMF54123
Blech.

As much as I dislike Apple, I have to give them some credit for sticking with a familiar interface for so long, instead of trying to reinvent the wheel every other release. The learning curve between XP and 7 is probably huge.

Actually, what I was going to suggest is that MS really is starting to copy some of what Apple does. Just look at the taskbar: it reminds me (although barely) of the way the Mac OS X handles open applications, but not open windows. e.g., each application has just one instance in the dock but can have many windows open.

Actually, it's more like an overzealous "Grouping" mechanism, which was in XP.

I just turned it off because I hate grouping.


Also, am I the only one who thought "Joy, another fucking ribbon" when I saw that?

____________________


Homepage (project updates, etc)
Lyskar
12210
-The Chaos within trumps the Chaos without-
Level: 192


Posts: 1817/12211
EXP: 99321329
For next: 552242

Since: 07-03-07

From: 52-2-88-7

Since last post: 7.4 years
Last activity: 7.3 years

Posted on 11-01-08 07:32:34 AM Link | Quote

Time/Date

11-01-08 01:32:34am

Posts

1817

Days Here

486

Level

60
Metal_Man88
Local Moderator
Originally posted by BMF54123
I forgot to reply to this:
Originally posted by roxahris
Also, the Windows 7 interface looks good... but very transparent. and thick.
One of my biggest complaints about Vista (and the default XP skin) is that the OS takes up so much screen space. It's very distracting. I don't use my computer to ogle gigantic shiny buttons and transparent glass windows (or, as MS calls it, the "user experience"), I use it to do stuff. When the "user experience" starts distracting me, or otherwise interfering with my ability to do said stuff, there's a problem.


Yeah, the first thing I do is turn that nonsense off.

Also, M$ loves to mimic Apple. That way, they steal their ideas without needing to make their own, and look revolutionary when they aren't. Everything since Windows 3.1, in fact, has been in a way stealing from Apple.

Although DOS was also stolen, and so was the mouse... etc etc. Truthfully, Microsoft doesn't deserve the credit they like to claim.

____________________
Original Layout © Tobias Kelmandia
Rachel Mae

Creature of Chaos
Level: 141


Posts: 1360/5929
EXP: 33604018
For next: 515996

Since: 07-03-07

Pronouns: she/her
From: Foxglen

Since last post: 21 days
Last activity: 50 min.

Posted on 11-01-08 08:16:33 AM (last edited by BMF54123 at 11-01-08 05:16 AM) Link | Quote
Wasn't the entire 9x interface stolen from some Linux GUI? Or was it the other way around? I remember seeing pictures of one with the exact same Start button and window layout, but I don't remember what it was.

____________________

Post 325/1311 (41 days), online 1 day ago
Posted on 11-01-08 02:49:15 PM Link | Quote
I can at least list a few things even MacOS 7.0 had (around the time Windows 3.1 came out) that Windows introduced with 95 or later:

- Apple menu -> Start menu (at least the "Programs" part of it)
- Trash -> Recycle Bin
- Aliases -> Shortcuts
- Desktop
- 8bit color icons (not until Windows 98, or 95 with a tweak)
- Custom icon for any specific file or folder, labels coloring them (might not be in Windows yet, but who knows if they add it one day and call it revolutionary)

For the things Windows had first or did better, I wouldn't know how much was stolen from others ...


And yeah, I also see higher desktop resolutions as more space to fit stuff, not a higher definition ... so even in 1920x1200+1280x1024, I still like to keep things small and compact, with minimal toolbars, small fonts, 16x16 icons, thin scrollbars and so on

____________________



#56  
Colin
Missing: One avatar. Will be restored at some point.

Post 547/10052
Active
8.3 years ago
Posted on 11-05-08 05:06:47 AM Link | Quote
Good, so I made the right call with not upgrading.

I think you can tell MS is going for the safe approach by just calling the OS Windows 7 (for now) since they sure as hell can't call it Vista 2.0. I didn't upgrade because of the various problems and due to the system requirements... I could run it, sure, but some games have higher requirements in Vista as opposed to XP... there's a game coming out which I can run comfortably in XP, but I'm struggling to meet the Vista requirements and I'm sure that would damper the performance. :\

Windows 7 sounds like it'll be a good time for me to upgrade my PC, if not sooner.

____________________
Colin's Babble... er, blog.

Pages: 1 2Next newer thread | Next older thread
Jul - Computers and Technology - Windows 7 - June 2009? New poll - New thread - New reply


Rusted Logic

Acmlmboard - commit 47be4dc [2021-08-23]
©2000-2022 Acmlm, Xkeeper, Kaito Sinclaire, et al.

31 database queries, 2 query cache hits.
Query execution time: 0.078624 seconds
Script execution time: 0.048440 seconds
Total render time: 0.127065 seconds