Register - Login
Views: 99802790
 Main - Memberlist - Active users - Calendar - Wiki - IRC Chat - Online users
Ranks - Rules/FAQ - Stats - Latest Posts - Color Chart - Smilies 		05-03-22 07:12:24 AM
Jul - Computers and Technology - Well, so much for watching videos. New poll - New thread - New reply
Pages: 1 2Next newer thread | Next older thread
Joe
Common spammer
🍬
Level: 111


Posts: 241/3392
EXP: 14501169
For next: 367191

Since: 08-02-07

From: Pororoca

Since last post: 12 days
Last activity: 8 hours
Posted on 01-29-08 04:49:56 AM Link | Quote
Apparently my computer likes to play them at an average of 7 fps, with the occasional utter failure.

I'm pretty sure it's either some hardware bottleneck or my graphics drivers, and I don't have any better hardware or less explosive drivers.

Facepalm.

Any suggestions, or am I stuck with this?

____________________
I want a new computer. Unfortunately, that requires money that I don't have.

My site is mostly links to free software. Guides on using said software will be put there eventually. Sooner if you bug me about it.
Deleted User
Collection of nobodies
Posted on 01-29-08 05:06:36 AM Link | Quote
It's strange, Sukasa is having similar problems that apparently started not too long ago...

____________________


===================
[Posted by NightKev]
Rena
I had one (1) message in Discord deleted and proceeded to make a huge, huge mess about how it was a violation of free speech and how moderators are supposed to be spam janitors and nobody should have the right to tell me not to talk about school shootings
Level: 135


Posts: 2216/5390
EXP: 29075571
For next: 259434

Since: 07-22-07

Pronouns: he/him/whatever
From: RSP Segment 6

Since last post: 342 days
Last activity: 342 days
Posted on 01-29-08 06:10:56 AM Link | Quote
Jul - Post #2216 - 01-29-08 01:10:56am
If you're not using VLC, then try it. It uses a lot less processing power than WMP. Had no trouble playing all my videos on an old machine that WMP could barely run on.

If you are, try completely removing and reinstalling it.

Are you sure that file isn't corrupt though?

____________________

Why Not To Buy From Sony • Codes w/o BS • My site
chungy
Member
Level: 31


Posts: 135/174
EXP: 168443
For next: 16920

Since: 08-04-07


Since last post: 14.1 years
Last activity: 13.9 years
Posted on 01-29-08 07:49:34 AM Link | Quote
Normal videos or crap like Flash videos? The latter is slower by design...
Joe
Common spammer
🍬
Level: 111


Posts: 242/3392
EXP: 14501169
For next: 367191

Since: 08-02-07

From: Pororoca

Since last post: 12 days
Last activity: 8 hours
Posted on 01-29-08 02:39:35 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by HyperHacker
If you're not using VLC, *snip*
I am using VLC. I downloaded 0.8.6d a couple days ago, but apparently that makes no difference.
Originally posted by HyperHacker
If you are, try completely removing and reinstalling it.
Well, that didn't work. (It did fix a file association problem, though.)
Originally posted by HyperHacker
Are you sure that file isn't corrupt though?
It plays just fine on my dad's laptop. It didn't drop a single frame. I checked.
Originally posted by chungy
Normal videos or crap like Flash videos? The latter is slower by design...
Normal video, H.264 codec.

I guess that means I'd better start saving up.

____________________
I want a new computer. Unfortunately, that requires money that I don't have.

My site is mostly links to free software. Guides on using said software will be put there eventually. Sooner if you bug me about it.
Aerakin
Ye Olde Layout
Level: 98


Posts: 916/2550
EXP: 9475901
For next: 178452

Since: 07-06-07

From: From the future

Since last post: 8.0 years
Last activity: 1.2 years
Posted on 01-29-08 02:41:18 PM Link | Quote



Originally posted by Joe
Normal video, H.264 codec.



Might be your problem. I've found H.264 to be slow as hell on my other computer.

____________________
Girlydragon
3030
Possibly neither Girly nor Dragon.
Level: 105


Posts: 453/3030
EXP: 12256160
For next: 6100

Since: 07-21-07

From: Sweden

Since last post: 282 days
Last activity: 9 hours
Posted on 01-29-08 02:49:41 PM (last edited by Girlydragon at 01-29-08 11:49 AM) Link | Quote
First get Media Player Classic then you should get combined community codec pack and lastly coreavc for H.264 decoding. Configure everything correctly and you will have the best video viewing setup ever. And coreavc gives you a huge frame rate boost on H.264 files.

____________________
lol alt tag
Rachel Mae

Creature of Chaos
Level: 141


Posts: 481/5929
EXP: 33603969
For next: 516045

Since: 07-03-07

Pronouns: she/her
From: Foxglen

Since last post: 21 days
Last activity: 27 min.
Posted on 01-29-08 07:26:17 PM Link | Quote

If VLC doesn't work, I highly doubt MPC will. (I was an MPC fan until it crashed/locked up one too many times and failed to play a couple of fairly common video formats.)

____________________

mreeew!
Girlydragon
3030
Possibly neither Girly nor Dragon.
Level: 105


Posts: 454/3030
EXP: 12256160
For next: 6100

Since: 07-21-07

From: Sweden

Since last post: 282 days
Last activity: 9 hours
Posted on 01-29-08 07:33:08 PM Link | Quote
Well from my experience MPC is better with handling external codecs. And considering the fact that coreavc is the best H.264 decoder there is I would think it's rather worth a try.

____________________
lol alt tag
Rena
I had one (1) message in Discord deleted and proceeded to make a huge, huge mess about how it was a violation of free speech and how moderators are supposed to be spam janitors and nobody should have the right to tell me not to talk about school shootings
Level: 135


Posts: 2221/5390
EXP: 29075571
For next: 259434

Since: 07-22-07

Pronouns: he/him/whatever
From: RSP Segment 6

Since last post: 342 days
Last activity: 342 days
Posted on 01-29-08 09:25:31 PM Link | Quote
Jul - Post #2221 - 01-29-08 04:25:31pm
H.264 does require a lot of processing power, or so I hear.

____________________

Why Not To Buy From Sony • Codes w/o BS • My site
Lyskar
12210
-The Chaos within trumps the Chaos without-
Level: 192


Posts: 1190/12211
EXP: 99321183
For next: 552388

Since: 07-03-07

From: 52-2-88-7

Since last post: 7.4 years
Last activity: 7.3 years
Posted on 01-29-08 11:12:19 PM Link | Quote

Time/Date

01-29-08 05:12:19pm

Posts

1190

Days Here

210

Level

44
Metal_Man88
Local Moderator
If the Community Codec Pack/WMP Classic/whatever still doesn't fix it, then I bet it's just your computer being too weak to play H264 stuff. What's your proccessor speed?

____________________
Original Layout © Tobias Kelmandia
Joe
Common spammer
🍬
Level: 111


Posts: 243/3392
EXP: 14501169
For next: 367191

Since: 08-02-07

From: Pororoca

Since last post: 12 days
Last activity: 8 hours
Posted on 01-30-08 03:51:55 AM Link | Quote
CoreAVC costs money, which I really shouldn't be spending when I'm trying to save up for new computer parts. I'm afraid that's not an option for me.

My processor speed is currently 1.25 GHz, but that's just because the motherboard is incompatible. It should be 2 GHz, according to this page.

____________________
I want a new computer. Unfortunately, that requires money that I don't have.

My site is mostly links to free software. Guides on using said software will be put there eventually. Sooner if you bug me about it.
Rachel Mae

Creature of Chaos
Level: 141


Posts: 485/5929
EXP: 33603969
For next: 516045

Since: 07-03-07

Pronouns: she/her
From: Foxglen

Since last post: 21 days
Last activity: 27 min.
Posted on 01-30-08 04:02:27 AM Link | Quote

Yeah, that's way too slow. The fact that your CPU/motherboard architecture is a few generations old doesn't help matters, either--you've got more bottlenecks than just the CPU speed in there. I see a new computer in your future.

____________________

mreeew!
Joe
Common spammer
🍬
Level: 111


Posts: 244/3392
EXP: 14501169
For next: 367191

Since: 08-02-07

From: Pororoca

Since last post: 12 days
Last activity: 8 hours
Posted on 01-30-08 04:58:36 AM Link | Quote
So, wait, a slower Centrino will work better than a faster Athlon XP? My dad's laptop is 1.73 GHz and has no problems...

Hmm...

I can afford this, but that in itself makes it suspicious. Why is a motherboard so cheap?

I suppose I could get a motherboard for my Celeron instead, but that won't get me anywhere either.



...Might as well try those nVidia drivers again. At least those are free.

____________________
I want a new computer. Unfortunately, that requires money that I don't have.

My site is mostly links to free software. Guides on using said software will be put there eventually. Sooner if you bug me about it.
Skreeny
Member
I have a custom title.
Level: 54


Posts: 209/636
EXP: 1172541
For next: 61329

Since: 09-15-07


Since last post: 9.3 years
Last activity: 1.2 years
Posted on 01-30-08 05:39:46 AM Link | Quote
That motherboard is so cheap because it's pretty old. Looking at the specs, it only supports DDR RAM (not even dual-channel) and AGP graphics, with no SATA connectors for hard drives/whatever. Basically, it's a cheap board, but it gives you no real room for improvement outside of a marginally better processor.

If your processor is only running at 1.25 GHz, then reasonably speaking, a processor running at 1.73 GHz would work better. Doesn't matter how good your chip is if it's so dreadfully underclocked.
Lyskar
12210
-The Chaos within trumps the Chaos without-
Level: 192


Posts: 1192/12211
EXP: 99321183
For next: 552388

Since: 07-03-07

From: 52-2-88-7

Since last post: 7.4 years
Last activity: 7.3 years
Posted on 01-30-08 06:10:19 AM Link | Quote

Time/Date

01-30-08 12:10:19am

Posts

1192

Days Here

210

Level

44
Metal_Man88
Local Moderator
Later chips are more efficient. 1.25 GHz with that old a mobo is a horrible block to something like H264, which is made with computers of today in mind (Like, 2 2.2 GHz cores in tandem) which runs nice and smoothly, say, for me, but dies horribly for you.

____________________
Original Layout © Tobias Kelmandia
Rachel Mae

Creature of Chaos
Level: 141


Posts: 486/5929
EXP: 33603969
For next: 516045

Since: 07-03-07

Pronouns: she/her
From: Foxglen

Since last post: 21 days
Last activity: 27 min.
Posted on 01-30-08 07:34:16 AM Link | Quote

Originally posted by Joe
I can afford this, but that in itself makes it suspicious. Why is a motherboard so cheap?

Ew. Ew ew ew. Stay as far away from PC-CHIPS as possible. There's a reason their boards are so cheap. Just look at the overall rating--out of 250 reviews, over 1/4 of them gave the board the lowest rating...

____________________

mreeew!
Joe
Common spammer
🍬
Level: 111


Posts: 247/3392
EXP: 14501169
For next: 367191

Since: 08-02-07

From: Pororoca

Since last post: 12 days
Last activity: 8 hours
Posted on 01-31-08 12:28:18 AM Link | Quote
My computer really is crap, isn't it.

Originally posted by Skreeny
DDR RAM (not even dual-channel)
All I've got is older stuff.
Originally posted by Skreeny
AGP graphics
That's the best I've got.
Originally posted by Skreeny
no SATA connectors
Couldn't use them if they were there.



____________________
I want a new computer. Unfortunately, that requires money that I don't have.

My site is mostly links to free software. Guides on using said software will be put there eventually. Sooner if you bug me about it.
chungy
Member
Level: 31


Posts: 136/174
EXP: 168443
For next: 16920

Since: 08-04-07


Since last post: 14.1 years
Last activity: 13.9 years
Posted on 01-31-08 03:03:41 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Skreeny
If your processor is only running at 1.25 GHz, then reasonably speaking, a processor running at 1.73 GHz would work better. Doesn't matter how good your chip is if it's so dreadfully underclocked.

And thus enters the megahertz myth. Bigger numbers for hertz/MIPS means absolutely nothing, unless you're strictly comparing exactly the same CPU architecture.
Deleted User
Collection of nobodies
Posted on 01-31-08 03:04:28 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by chungy
Originally posted by Skreeny
If your processor is only running at 1.25 GHz, then reasonably speaking, a processor running at 1.73 GHz would work better. Doesn't matter how good your chip is if it's so dreadfully underclocked.

And thus enters the megahertz myth. Bigger numbers for hertz/MIPS means absolutely nothing, unless you're strictly comparing exactly the same CPU architecture.
Elaborate please.

____________________


===================
[Posted by NightKev]
Pages: 1 2Next newer thread | Next older thread
Jul - Computers and Technology - Well, so much for watching videos. New poll - New thread - New reply


Rusted Logic

Acmlmboard - commit 47be4dc [2021-08-23]
©2000-2022 Acmlm, Xkeeper, Kaito Sinclaire, et al.

30 database queries, 5 query cache hits.
Query execution time: 0.096246 seconds
Script execution time: 0.049178 seconds
Total render time: 0.145424 seconds