Register - Login
Views: 99805419
Main - Memberlist - Active users - Calendar - Wiki - IRC Chat - Online users
Ranks - Rules/FAQ - Stats - Latest Posts - Color Chart - Smilies
05-03-22 07:51:32 AM
Jul - News - Supreme Court: No GPS tracking without a warrant New poll - New thread - New reply
Next newer thread | Next older thread
Rena
I had one (1) message in Discord deleted and proceeded to make a huge, huge mess about how it was a violation of free speech and how moderators are supposed to be spam janitors and nobody should have the right to tell me not to talk about school shootings
Level: 135


Posts: 4525/5390
EXP: 29075644
For next: 259361

Since: 07-22-07

Pronouns: he/him/whatever
From: RSP Segment 6

Since last post: 342 days
Last activity: 342 days

Posted on 02-26-12 07:27:20 AM Link | Quote
Post #4525 · 02-26-12 02:27:20 AM
Win for privacy.


The Supreme Court’s recent ruling overturning the warrantless use of GPS tracking devices has caused a “sea change” inside the U.S. Justice Department, according to FBI General Counsel Andrew Weissmann.

Mr. Weissmann, speaking at a University of San Francisco conference called “Big Brother in the 21st Century” on Friday, said that the court ruling prompted the FBI to turn off about 3,000 GPS tracking devices that were in use.

These devices were often stuck underneath cars to track the movements of the car owners. In U.S. v. Jones, the Supreme Court ruled that using a device to track a car owner without a search warrant violated the law.

After the ruling, the FBI had a problem collecting the devices that it had turned off, Mr. Weissmann said. In some cases, he said, the FBI sought court orders to obtain permission to turn the devices on briefly – only in order to locate and retrieve them.

Mr. Weissmann said that the FBI is now working to develop new guidelines for the use of GPS devices. He said the agency is also working on guidelines to cover the broader implications of the court decision beyond GPS devices.

For instance, he said, agency is now “wrestling” with the legality of whether agents can lift up the lid of a trash can without committing trespass. The majority opinion in U.S. v. Jones held that the agents had trespassed when placing the GPS device on a car without warrant.

He said the agency is also considering the implications of the concurring justices – whose arguments were largely based on the idea that a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy in the totality of their movements, even if those movements are in public.

“From a law enforcement perspective, even though its not technically holding, we have to anticipate how it’s going to go down the road,” Mr. Weissmann said.


____________________
paulguy

Green Birdo
Level: 93


Posts: 2096/2294
EXP: 8032392
For next: 20418

Since: 09-14-07

From: Buffalo, NY

Since last post: 9.7 years
Last activity: 9.7 years

Posted on 02-26-12 09:16:49 AM Link | Quote
Paulguy's Post configuration
Tthis is pretty good. Of course, they can still track people if they get a warrant. I wondeer what this does for cars that have built in tracking functionality used (hopefully) for car theft.

____________________
Lyskar
12210
-The Chaos within trumps the Chaos without-
Level: 192


Posts: 10946/12211
EXP: 99321432
For next: 552139

Since: 07-03-07

From: 52-2-88-7

Since last post: 7.4 years
Last activity: 7.3 years

Posted on 02-26-12 06:52:41 PM Link | Quote
Stats
Time/Date
02-26-12 12:52:41 PM
Posts
10946
Days Here
1699
Level
155
Metal_Man88's Post
It's nice to see that privacy still lives on in some small cases like this. I just wonder what kind of precedent this will set down for future cases...

____________________
Eisnaught - SSQ² - Mobius Roleplay - SSS
Rena
I had one (1) message in Discord deleted and proceeded to make a huge, huge mess about how it was a violation of free speech and how moderators are supposed to be spam janitors and nobody should have the right to tell me not to talk about school shootings
Level: 135


Posts: 4528/5390
EXP: 29075644
For next: 259361

Since: 07-22-07

Pronouns: he/him/whatever
From: RSP Segment 6

Since last post: 342 days
Last activity: 342 days

Posted on 02-29-12 11:17:51 PM Link | Quote
Post #4528 · 02-29-12 06:17:51 PM
I suppose it wouldn't be hard for the owner of a car to get a warrant to track it...

But then, apparently Tesla Motors can remotely track their cars... they use it to warn the driver if it's not plugged in, but I wonder how this would affect such. Although I don't see why they even need to know where the car is, just to call the owner...

____________________
Next newer thread | Next older thread
Jul - News - Supreme Court: No GPS tracking without a warrant New poll - New thread - New reply


Rusted Logic

Acmlmboard - commit 47be4dc [2021-08-23]
©2000-2022 Acmlm, Xkeeper, Kaito Sinclaire, et al.

28 database queries.
Query execution time: 0.107973 seconds
Script execution time: 0.018139 seconds
Total render time: 0.126112 seconds