Post #4360 · 10-30-11 01:16:54 AM
Originally posted by paulguy
Xkeeper is right with a lot of stuff, but it's really not greatly organized. There might be a root cause, but it seems that the majority of the people involved just don't even know what they're protesting. They're in a shitty situation and don't know what to do about it but get angry, but really don't understand why the situation is what itt is, so they're not united.
That's what it looks like to me. I'm not even sure what exactly they're protesting. It just seems like "we're pissed off so we're gonna hang out here and be a bit of a nuisance".
Granted, I haven't researched it either - but I shouldn't really have to. If you're going to protest something, you should make it pretty clear what that thing is.
To me it seems like the big corporations have the country by the balls, and it's going to take a lot to fix that. Conspiracy theorists are always saying they run the world, as if by force or bribery or some such. I think it's just economics really. The government acts in the corporations' best interests not because of extortion or influence, but because doing otherwise risks damaging the already poor economy.
It also seems like one of the biggest problems, on all scales, is legal loopholes. I know plenty of people whose employers refuse to give them a full-time job, because that would have to come with various benefits - but will keep them part-time at 39.5 hours every week. Or as I experienced myself, giving only a couple hours in some weeks, so that their average hours per week is just low enough to be ineligible for benefits. Of course this happens on the mega-corp scales too. Some companies and rich folks exploit loopholes here and there to avoid ever paying any taxes.
Unfortunately, there's not a lot that can be done about it. Laws are much like the program code that runs things like game consoles. A set of rules that in theory prevents anyone from doing something they're not supposed to, such as tampering with system files, or screwing someone out of their money. The problem is there will always be several orders of magnitude more effort being putting into finding loopholes than into writing and fixing the rules. The people looking for exploits vastly outnumber and out-resource the people implementing the system - especially when they stand to make huge financial gains from their findings. So just as hackers always eventually manage to trick the machine into doing what they want, crooks will always eventually manage to find a way to do what the law intends to prevent without actually breaking it. The only real difference is one set of rules is enforced by police, the other by mathematics.
But hey, I'm just a 24-year-old geek who's never studied economics or law nor been outside Canada, so I could be completely wrong.
____________________