Register - Login
Views: 99851963
 Main - Memberlist - Active users - Calendar - Wiki - IRC Chat - Online users
Ranks - Rules/FAQ - Stats - Latest Posts - Color Chart - Smilies 		05-04-22 09:47:58 AM
Jul - News - Scientists measure particles breaking the speed of light New poll - New thread - New reply
Next newer thread | Next older thread
Adelheid
Posted on 09-22-11 06:57:28 PM Link | Quote
Particles found to break speed of light - Reuters

Not sure how to feel right now

____________________
Pay attention. This will be on the test.
paulguy

Green Birdo
Level: 93


Posts: 1826/2294
EXP: 8033204
For next: 19606

Since: 09-14-07

From: Buffalo, NY

Since last post: 9.7 years
Last activity: 9.7 years
Posted on 09-23-11 12:04:36 AM Link | Quote
Paulguy's Post configuration
Light normally takes 2.4 ms to cover 500 miles? Didn't know light was that slow.

____________________
Taryn

Passed away.

Thanks for being a part of us, even if it wasn't always on the best of terms.

1987-2014


Level: 204


Posts: 14337/14742
EXP: 121760523
For next: 1589295

Since: 09-01-09

From: Seattle

Since last post: 10.1 years
Last activity: 9.8 years
Posted on 09-23-11 12:25:09 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Google
(500 mi) / (2.4 ms) = 335 280 000 m / s
the speed of light = 299 792 458 m / s


Sounds about right when you account for rounding errors, actually. Even small amounts of rounding can make the answer a lot different

Looks like these particles are only barely faster than light. There are one million nanoseconds in a millisecond, so the 60 nanoseconds is only about 0.0025% of the total time. I wonder if their instruments were accurate to the nanosecond level

____________________
TKB Super Mario Bros. • TKB Super Mario Bros., Volume II
ReiNi
さよなら＊へヴン
Level: 124


Posts: 3627/4444
EXP: 21771437
For next: 65164

Since: 07-21-07


Since last post: 6.7 years
Last activity: 3.3 years
Posted on 09-23-11 01:02:08 AM Link | Quote
Request you!
I kinda hope they are right, actually. It would force to revise all of the modern science for further inconsistencies that are taken as granted, and open way to more research.

I mean, practice fucking up theory happened plenty of times before. One of the simplest cases being the different atomic models. So yeah.

____________________
Rena
I had one (1) message in Discord deleted and proceeded to make a huge, huge mess about how it was a violation of free speech and how moderators are supposed to be spam janitors and nobody should have the right to tell me not to talk about school shootings
Level: 135


Posts: 4335/5390
EXP: 29078555
For next: 256450

Since: 07-22-07

Pronouns: he/him/whatever
From: RSP Segment 6

Since last post: 343 days
Last activity: 343 days
Posted on 09-23-11 02:03:15 AM (last edited by Rena at 09-22-11 11:04 PM) Link | Quote
Post #4335 · 09-22-11 09:03:15 PM
I'm still expecting some kind of measurement error, or that the speed of light is just slightly higher than they thought. Or even that light doesn't quite reach the "speed of light"/"universal speed limit" for some reason.

Still, they could very well be right, and that would have some pretty cool implications.

____________________
Programs
stuffgoeshere
Log outShut down
Post #4335...[blag][Twitter][Freenet]
paulguy

Green Birdo
Level: 93


Posts: 1828/2294
EXP: 8033204
For next: 19606

Since: 09-14-07

From: Buffalo, NY

Since last post: 9.7 years
Last activity: 9.7 years
Posted on 09-23-11 03:06:15 AM Link | Quote
Paulguy's Post configuration
I imagine they had accounted for accuracy problems by doing the test multiple times and comparing to other things they know will move at the speed of light. Though I suppose it is possible that certain particles are slightly faster than others, and that this new velocity would be the new universe speed limit. I don't know much really anything about physics, though.

____________________
Adelheid
Posted on 09-23-11 08:19:42 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Terra
Originally posted by Google
(500 mi) / (2.4 ms) = 335 280 000 m / s
the speed of light = 299 792 458 m / s


Sounds about right when you account for rounding errors, actually. Even small amounts of rounding can make the answer a lot different
Especially when you consider that a BETTER representation of 730 kilometers would be 456 miles, as a mile is just a hair over 8/5ths of a kilometer.


Originally posted by Rena
or that the speed of light is just slightly higher than they thought.
l o l

I bet that's not true.

____________________
Pay attention. This will be on the test.
Next newer thread | Next older thread
Jul - News - Scientists measure particles breaking the speed of light New poll - New thread - New reply


Rusted Logic

Acmlmboard - commit 47be4dc [2021-08-23]
©2000-2022 Acmlm, Xkeeper, Kaito Sinclaire, et al.

28 database queries, 1 query cache hits.
Query execution time: 0.105919 seconds
Script execution time: 0.016613 seconds
Total render time: 0.122532 seconds