TheKins
Member
Level: 21
   
Posts: 14/80
EXP: 45954 For next: 3989
Since: 01-17-11
Since last post: 9.0 years Last activity: 9.0 years
|
| Posted on 07-10-11 02:57:58 PM (last edited by TheKins at 07-10-11 12:28 PM) |
Link | Quote
| |
I just spend an hour or two going hog-wild making new template icons because the poor HTML-resizing of the cactus sprite was kind of bothering me. So now nearly all those sorts of templates have their own little cactus icon variant, and I've done little adjustments as needed.
I do, however, have some questions:
1.) What the heck should I do with the Sucks template? I understand it was originally intended as a joke template by XK and BMF, but it's grown a bit of charm to be honest. I've currently just given it a cropped version of the original graphic since it was way larger than all the other templates, but feel free to revert that if you want the full TAKATAKA glory. Should I make a new cactus icon for it, and if so, what should it be?
2.) Similarly, what should I do for the New template? I plan on leaving Stub as it is, because Cacti are stubbly enough on their own.
3.) Sexy CSS Gradients: Yes or No?
Looking forward to feedback!
EDIT: I also Herded together a bunch of game content-related templates ala the cleanup ones for ease of access, and updated the Prototype one to resemble the rest. Please tell me if I'm going too far! |
Taryn
Passed away.
Thanks for being a part of us, even if it wasn't always on the best of terms.
1987-2014
Level: 204
   

Posts: 13994/14742
EXP: 121753052 For next: 1596766
Since: 09-01-09
From: Seattle
Since last post: 10.1 years Last activity: 9.8 years
|
|
|
Rachel Mae
 Creature of Chaos
Level: 141
   

Posts: 4216/5929
EXP: 33605644 For next: 514370
Since: 07-03-07
Pronouns: she/her
From: Foxglen
Since last post: 21 days Last activity: 13 hours
|
|
| | | | | Originally posted by TheKins 1.) What the heck should I do with the Sucks template?
Leave it alone.
Originally posted by TheKins 2.) Similarly, what should I do for the New template?
How about a glossy Web2.0 cactus with a starburst behind it? (considering a lot of Web2.0 sites are vapid and devoid of content, it works both ways )
Originally posted by TheKins 3.) Sexy CSS Gradients: Yes or No?
No.
____________________
| | | | |
|
|
|
YK
Permabanned! At some point you just have to cease and de-racist.
Level: NaN
 

Posts: 612/-665
EXP: NaN For next: 0
Since: 06-25-10
From: Oregon
Since last post: 10.6 years Last activity: 9.8 years
|
| Posted on 07-11-11 12:13:39 AM (last edited by YK at 07-11-11 04:20 AM) |
Link | Quote
| |
I'm actually not a fan of the Prototype template, or the "In Development" and "Unreleased Game" or whatever templates. Nagboxes are basically there because something needs to be done with the page; I'm not in favor of what basically amounts to a *permanent* nagbox atop pages. A single "text-only" template works better on those pages.
That said, I like all the different cactus images. Cute.
____________________
 |
TheKins
Member
Level: 21
   
Posts: 15/80
EXP: 45954 For next: 3989
Since: 01-17-11
Since last post: 9.0 years Last activity: 9.0 years
|
| Posted on 07-11-11 06:54:53 AM (last edited by TheKins at 07-11-11 07:26 AM) |
Link | Quote
| |
Originally posted by Waffle Ryebread How about a glossy Web2.0 cactus with a starburst behind it? (considering a lot of Web2.0 sites are vapid and devoid of content, it works both ways )
Done!
Originally posted by YK I'm actually not a fan of the Prototype template, or the "In Development" and "Unreleased Game" or whatever templates. Nagboxes are basically there because something needs to be done with the page; I'm not in favor of what basically amounts to a *permanent* nagbox atop pages. A single "text-only" template works better on those pages.
Personally, I'd perfer little "header" bar in the bob, above the title shot. Nothing fancy, just "PROTOTYPE" in white on red, linking back to the original page. Ditto with "UNDER ACTIVE DEVELOPMENT" and "NEVER RELEASED".
Thoughts? |
Xkeeper
Level: 263
   

Posts: 19108/25353
EXP: 297156021 For next: 1804432
Since: 07-03-07
Pronouns: they/them/????????
Since last post: 3 days Last activity: 13 hours
|
|
totally my reaction |