Originally posted by MaxKnight
I mean, not that I actually got PM'd by the big cheese telling me who he was, but Ramon did more or less out himself by attempting to claim he was the Thug...
Nope - even as Godfather, I wouldn't admit being on the evil side (what for?). Same could count for you - hinting at being the thug.
You guys don't see that me and MaxKnight were able to lure the Godfather into killing the real thug. If he was alive right now, we'd have lost already. Yep. I'm the bystander. I've got nothing to lose that'd help the others. There's nothing else that could explain my gameplay style this round...
Furthermore, I found (or find) it suspicious how Sukasa defended me consecutively after the first round where I blatantly accused him, upon which he didn't quite react as I wanted. Staying under the radar, perhaps? To not start an accusation war where the possibility was given you'd be lynched?
You even admitted you knew what I did - you also knew I'd take back my accusation of you and perhaps accuse another person, clearing you from the eventual voting round - and started to defend me to make yourself look like my "guardian", upon which I'd not suspect you anymore. (I did however find it to be a little suspicious, since I had all the reasons to be suspicious - still you kind of made it sound conceivable that I wasn't.) And now you seem to accuse me for exactly the reason you defended me with before (except the thug part, but that again is something that needs to be done to get results - I think you said it's what I do). The end justifies the means.
Of course, there's still Kirby Mario - talking about people being suspicious, not suspicious or not suspicious enough is all he's done, besides voting no-kill every round. It's either him or Sukasa. Big shot there.
It's funny. I feel like Hercule Poirot.
|