Register - Login
Views: 99831364
Main - Memberlist - Active users - Calendar - Wiki - IRC Chat - Online users
Ranks - Rules/FAQ - Stats - Latest Posts - Color Chart - Smilies
05-03-22 09:25:20 PM
Jul - Computers and Technology - Scottish Researchers Claim 1000-Core Processor New poll - New thread - New reply
Next newer thread | Next older thread
FieryIce

Luigi
Level: 119


Posts: 1796/4161
EXP: 18759403
For next: 169888

Since: 12-18-08

From: Chicago

Since last post: 189 days
Last activity: 3 days

Posted on 01-06-11 02:18:12 AM Link | Quote
This is pretty sweet!


Researchers at a Scottish university claim to have made a breakthrough in the drive towards more powerful processors while conserving energy too. The team, from Glasgow University, led by Dr Wim Vanderbauwhede, have succeeded in squeezing 1000 cores on a single chip.

The researchers, working in conjunction with colleagues from University of Massachusetts, Lowell, used a chip called a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) which can be configured into specific circuits by the user rather than relying on the factory settings. This technology allowed Dr Vanderbauwhede to divide up the transistors within the chip into small groups and ask each to perform a different task thus creating 1000 mini-circuits -- or to put it another way, creating a 1000-core processor.

To demonstrate the chip's effectiveness, the research team used it to process an MPEG algorithm at a speed of 5Gbps, about 20 times faster than processors used in current PCs.

Dr Vanderbauwhede, who hopes to present his research at the International Symposium on Applied Reconfigurable Computing in March, said: "FPGAs are not used within standard computers because they are fairly difficult to program, but their processing power is huge while their energy consumption is very small because they are so much quicker - so they are also a greener option.

However, he warned that the research was an early proof-of-concept work but added that he hoped "to demonstrate a convenient way to program FPGAs so that their potential to provide very fast processing power could be used much more widely in future computing and electronics."


Soon, computers will begin replacing us, as they would be too advanced for us.
paulguy

Green Birdo
Level: 93


Posts: 1197/2294
EXP: 8032816
For next: 19994

Since: 09-14-07

From: Buffalo, NY

Since last post: 9.7 years
Last activity: 9.7 years

Posted on 01-06-11 05:22:48 AM Link | Quote
Paulguy's Post configuration
Well, it seems like it's a lot of very very specialized units, that perform 1 specific function. Nothing very new, but the idea of FPGAs in a computer that are openly software programmable would be pretty neat. Probably could make very efficient video decoders/encoders, graphics renderers, physics engines, etc. Would be neat if it had some analog components you could deal with, which might be more analogous to more "natural" things.

____________________
Joe
Common spammer
🍬
Level: 111


Posts: 1751/3392
EXP: 14501966
For next: 366394

Since: 08-02-07

From: Pororoca

Since last post: 12 days
Last activity: 1 hour

Posted on 01-06-11 05:23:11 AM Link | Quote
This isn't much of a feat. It's somewhere between a CPU and a GPU, which is neat, but like a GPU it's completely useless at anything that isn't massively parallel. It isn't crippled by the typical GPU requirement of exactly parallel execution, but typical computer tasks don't scale all that well to a thousand cores.

MPEG-2 encoding happens to be something that's easy to run massively parallel, if you only care about speed.

____________________
Lyskar
12210
-The Chaos within trumps the Chaos without-
Level: 192


Posts: 7613/12211
EXP: 99326612
For next: 546959

Since: 07-03-07

From: 52-2-88-7

Since last post: 7.4 years
Last activity: 7.3 years

Posted on 01-06-11 05:23:40 AM Link | Quote
Stats
Time/Date
01-05-11 11:23:40 PM
Posts
7613
Days Here
1282
Level
128
Metal_Man88's Post
The difficulty will be, as usual, making it more widely available and making more stuff capable of using it.

____________________

Eisnaught - SSQ² - Mobius Roleplay - SSS
Nicole

Disk-kun
Level: 146


Posts: 2092/6469
EXP: 38286890
For next: 226404

Since: 07-07-07

Pronouns: she/her
From: Boston, MA

Since last post: 78 days
Last activity: 1 day

Posted on 01-08-11 07:06:38 PM Link | Quote

Originally posted by paulguy
Well, it seems like it's a lot of very very specialized units, that perform 1 specific function. Nothing very new, but the idea of FPGAs in a computer that are openly software programmable would be pretty neat. Probably could make very efficient video decoders/encoders, graphics renderers, physics engines, etc. Would be neat if it had some analog components you could deal with, which might be more analogous to more "natural" things.

Yeah, I could see some interesting things happening if you have FPGA units within an otherwise "standard" computer... it'll be interesting to see if this goes anywhere.

____________________

Sukasa

Level: 123


Posts: 2831/4326
EXP: 20936864
For next: 294402

Since: 07-07-07


Since last post: 1.1 years
Last activity: 1.1 years

Posted on 01-09-11 03:59:43 AM Link | Quote

Integrating an FPGA into a Von Neumann system.. yeah, that could really be useful, esp. if you could reprogram it as easily as you can edit a file.

____________________
* hydrapheetz puts on the kittydunce hat
Zero One
5170
And as we fall the spirit carries on,
That a hero'll come and save us all,
As we call the ones we left below,
We all dream of the day we rise above
Level: 129


Posts: 2458/5173
EXP: 24573411
For next: 476243

Since: 05-24-10

From: Delta Quadrant

Since last post: 1.6 years
Last activity: 131 days

Posted on 01-09-11 05:41:59 PM Link | Quote
It still couldn't run Crysis.

Would it ever really be necessary to have 1,000 cores? Maybe for medical research?

____________________
"The last Metroid is in captivity."
And yet, the galaxy is STILL fucked.
Thanks Xkeeper, Bagel and Sanky for the help!

Joe
Common spammer
🍬
Level: 111


Posts: 1758/3392
EXP: 14501966
For next: 366394

Since: 08-02-07

From: Pororoca

Since last post: 12 days
Last activity: 1 hour

Posted on 01-09-11 06:03:59 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Zero One
It still couldn't run Crysis.
Maybe not, but it could render the graphics.

____________________
paulguy

Green Birdo
Level: 93


Posts: 1205/2294
EXP: 8032816
For next: 19994

Since: 09-14-07

From: Buffalo, NY

Since last post: 9.7 years
Last activity: 9.7 years

Posted on 01-09-11 11:18:34 PM Link | Quote
Paulguy's Post configuration
Originally posted by Zero One
It still couldn't run Crysis.

Would it ever really be necessary to have 1,000 cores? Maybe for medical research?

I think you may be kind of missing the point of it. It's not 1000 general processing units that are somewhat OK at a lot of things, but not terribly fast; it's 1000 units that do 1 specific operation very fast. It can also be reconfigurable to do whatever the application needs, whether that's encoding, decoding, physics, graphics or really anything that needs to process a lot of data.

____________________
Next newer thread | Next older thread
Jul - Computers and Technology - Scottish Researchers Claim 1000-Core Processor New poll - New thread - New reply


Rusted Logic

Acmlmboard - commit 47be4dc [2021-08-23]
©2000-2022 Acmlm, Xkeeper, Kaito Sinclaire, et al.

31 database queries, 2 query cache hits.
Query execution time: 0.085716 seconds
Script execution time: 0.020959 seconds
Total render time: 0.106675 seconds