Register - Login
Views: 99800686
Main - Memberlist - Active users - Calendar - Wiki - IRC Chat - Online users
Ranks - Rules/FAQ - Stats - Latest Posts - Color Chart - Smilies
05-03-22 06:40:52 AM
Jul - News - Oh hey remember that net neutrality thing New poll - New thread - New reply
Next newer thread | Next older thread
Rena
I had one (1) message in Discord deleted and proceeded to make a huge, huge mess about how it was a violation of free speech and how moderators are supposed to be spam janitors and nobody should have the right to tell me not to talk about school shootings
Level: 135


Posts: 3965/5390
EXP: 29075512
For next: 259493

Since: 07-22-07

Pronouns: he/him/whatever
From: RSP Segment 6

Since last post: 342 days
Last activity: 342 days

Posted on 12-20-10 09:06:18 AM Link | Quote
12-20-10 04:06:18 AM
Post #3965
These guys sure don't.

____________________



[loading witty comment...]
Lunaria

Moon Bunny! :3
Level: 139


Posts: 3235/5754
EXP: 32052076
For next: 415369

Since: 07-28-07

Pronouns: she/her
From: pile of fluff

Since last post: 6 days
Last activity: 5 days

Posted on 12-20-10 09:10:08 AM Link | Quote
The same thing have also been on the spin in Sweden with the whole ACTA agreement, which they are trying to make pass without even waiting for EU to get done with looking into if it's really a good idea. (Which anyone with a brain should already know it's not.)

____________________
Rick
M'Lord, there's a knife in your head!
Level: 152


Posts: 1921/7540
EXP: 43721758
For next: 579902

Since: 02-15-10

From: Maine

Since last post: 6 days
Last activity: 6 days

Posted on 12-20-10 01:35:32 PM Link | Quote
Cripe, if this shit goes through anywhere, I feel like we're all kind of screwed because any money monger with even the slightest hint of a brain will think this is a good idea, and then we either get fucked out of our internet OR get some new "unlimited" package thrown at us which is far, far more expensive than what we've had to pay for previously.

Oh God, don't pass this, don't pass this, don't pass this...

____________________
Nicole

Disk-kun
Level: 146


Posts: 1862/6469
EXP: 38284718
For next: 228576

Since: 07-07-07

Pronouns: she/her
From: Boston, MA

Since last post: 78 days
Last activity: 1 day

Posted on 12-20-10 01:38:34 PM Link | Quote

I'm too lazy to listen to audio, but it seems like this is just a marketing presentation from Allot and Openet (now there's a poorly-named company), and not necessarily something the wireless companies are actually planning on implementing... companies propose a lot of things, I wouldn't be sounding the alarm bells just yet...

I really have to wonder how they plan to determine what exactly people are using in a method that can't be subverted... I can't imagine people wouldn't figure out a way to subvert their system, no matter how perfect they claim it is...

____________________

Taryn

Passed away.

Thanks for being a part of us, even if it wasn't always on the best of terms.

1987-2014


Level: 204


Posts: 10738/14742
EXP: 121745656
For next: 1604162

Since: 09-01-09

From: Seattle

Since last post: 10.1 years
Last activity: 9.8 years

Posted on 12-20-10 01:41:18 PM Link | Quote
Argh

I'm getting rather pissed off at how parts of the US government as of late are putting the rights of rich corporations above everything else.

____________________

TKB Super Mario Bros.TKB Super Mario Bros., Volume II
Xenesis

Roy Koopa
Actually a Doctor
Level: 101


Posts: 882/2732
EXP: 10486648
For next: 231027

Since: 07-28-07

Pronouns: She/Her
From: Orange Star's Retirement Villa

Since last post: 9 days
Last activity: 20 hours

Posted on 12-20-10 01:47:39 PM Link | Quote
I don't know, it looks like England is headed for about as bad if not worse.

Still, scary stuff. Even for me as an Australian and our own brand of crackpot internet politics.
Gabu

Star Mario
Placeholder Ikachan until :effort: is found
Level: 172


Posts: 4223/9981
EXP: 67989290
For next: 112944

Since: 08-10-09

Pronouns: they/them, she/her
From: Santa Cruisin' USA

Since last post: 56 days
Last activity: 4 days

Posted on 12-20-10 03:01:34 PM Link | Quote
I'm thinking that if ANYTHING like this is implemented in the U.S. that there should be a national boycott of the Internet.

(I have my extreme doubts it would work, but people have gotten by without the Internet for thousands of years. It'll be more like the unfortunate use of strike breakers back in the early 20th century if anything. They'll just find a way to work around out self-imposed ban)

____________________

Rick
M'Lord, there's a knife in your head!
Level: 152


Posts: 1931/7540
EXP: 43721758
For next: 579902

Since: 02-15-10

From: Maine

Since last post: 6 days
Last activity: 6 days

Posted on 12-21-10 02:09:43 AM Link | Quote
Tell that to the 500 million people on Facebook. This means like...millions of people are addicted to Facebook and wouldn't be helping with the boycott much.

Then again, I'm just cynical.

____________________
FieryIce

Luigi
Level: 119


Posts: 1373/4161
EXP: 18758224
For next: 171067

Since: 12-18-08

From: Chicago

Since last post: 188 days
Last activity: 2 days

Posted on 12-21-10 11:15:19 PM (last edited by FieryIce at 12-21-10 08:16 PM) Link | Quote
Didn't the FCC already passed the net neutrality thing that prevents ISPs from treating bandwidth differently (or charging for services) ?

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/21/business/media/21fcc.html


The proposed rules of the online road would prevent fixed-line broadband providers like Comcast and Qwest from blocking access to sites and applications. The rules, however, would allow wireless companies more latitude in putting limits on access to services and applications.


Ah, yes, the bold text scares me (I'm a Sprint user )
Rena
I had one (1) message in Discord deleted and proceeded to make a huge, huge mess about how it was a violation of free speech and how moderators are supposed to be spam janitors and nobody should have the right to tell me not to talk about school shootings
Level: 135


Posts: 3966/5390
EXP: 29075512
For next: 259493

Since: 07-22-07

Pronouns: he/him/whatever
From: RSP Segment 6

Since last post: 342 days
Last activity: 342 days

Posted on 12-21-10 11:35:02 PM Link | Quote
12-21-10 06:35:02 PM
Post #3966
Originally posted by Gabu
I'm thinking that if ANYTHING like this is implemented in the U.S. that there should be a national boycott of the Internet.
Maybe we should focus on solutions that have even the slightest microscopic chance of ever actually happening.

It's a war on the free Internet. We attack by petitioning and protesting and we defend by moving to where they can't touch us. Decentralization. They can't stop what they can't control. The problem is for a long time people thought they couldn't control the Internet, and they were wrong - but they can't enforce different rules based on where your information is coming or going if they can't tell where that is.

I keep saying this for a reason: Encrypt. Everything.


Oh yeah, and the FCC appears to be going along with this. We don't have much time.

____________________



[loading witty comment...]
Nicole

Disk-kun
Level: 146


Posts: 1888/6469
EXP: 38284718
For next: 228576

Since: 07-07-07

Pronouns: she/her
From: Boston, MA

Since last post: 78 days
Last activity: 1 day

Posted on 12-21-10 11:38:27 PM Link | Quote

Originally posted by FieryIce
Didn't the FCC already passed the net neutrality thing that prevents ISPs from treating bandwidth differently (or charging for services) ?

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/21/business/media/21fcc.html


The proposed rules of the online road would prevent fixed-line broadband providers like Comcast and Qwest from blocking access to sites and applications. The rules, however, would allow wireless companies more latitude in putting limits on access to services and applications.


Ah, yes, the bold text scares me (I'm a Sprint user )

That article doesn't work for me, since I don't have a NYT account...

But yeah, I've heard there are some rules that have been put into place, but they don't apply to wireless... plus my understanding is that they're pretty weak guidelines in general. I don't know, I can kind of see an argument that some restrictions on certain processes on wireless might make sense because of limited bandwidth, but on the other hand the wireless companies being what they are just exempting them from everything and hoping they just do the right thing doesn't seem to be the in the public interest either...

____________________

Xkeeper

Level: 263


Posts: 18500/25353
EXP: 297140607
For next: 1819846

Since: 07-03-07

Pronouns: they/them/????????

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 54 min.

Posted on 12-21-10 11:43:32 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Rena
Originally posted by Gabu
I'm thinking that if ANYTHING like this is implemented in the U.S. that there should be a national boycott of the Internet.
Maybe we should focus on solutions that have even the slightest microscopic chance of ever actually happening.

It's a war on the free Internet. We attack by petitioning and protesting and we defend by moving to where they can't touch us. Decentralization. They can't stop what they can't control. The problem is for a long time people thought they couldn't control the Internet, and they were wrong - but they can't enforce different rules based on where your information is coming or going if they can't tell where that is.

I keep saying this for a reason: Encrypt. Everything.


Oh yeah, and the FCC appears to be going along with this. We don't have much time.

Yeah, try saying that when there's a very specific list of places you can connect to with any "unknown" connections costing you far greater than anything else. (See also: Long distance calling. Seriously, what the hell? VoIP to any computer on the internet with a decent connection is free, but calling a phone is $rape/hour?)

As for the rest of the stuff, well... who knows. Things will only get better starting next year!

____________________
Lyskar
12210
-The Chaos within trumps the Chaos without-
Level: 192


Posts: 7443/12211
EXP: 99320982
For next: 552589

Since: 07-03-07

From: 52-2-88-7

Since last post: 7.4 years
Last activity: 7.3 years

Posted on 12-22-10 05:54:50 AM Link | Quote
Stats
Time/Date
12-21-10 11:54:50 PM
Posts
7443
Days Here
1267
Level
126
Metal_Man88's Post
All I figure is the cost of things going up and some things being squelched. To be honest, it's not like any of us have any voice in it--anyone we vote for will be in favor of corporation-friendly stuff anyway.

The system's a sham.

____________________

Eisnaught - SSQ² - Mobius Roleplay - SSS
Rena
I had one (1) message in Discord deleted and proceeded to make a huge, huge mess about how it was a violation of free speech and how moderators are supposed to be spam janitors and nobody should have the right to tell me not to talk about school shootings
Level: 135


Posts: 3969/5390
EXP: 29075512
For next: 259493

Since: 07-22-07

Pronouns: he/him/whatever
From: RSP Segment 6

Since last post: 342 days
Last activity: 342 days

Posted on 12-24-10 02:39:02 AM Link | Quote
12-23-10 09:39:02 PM
Post #3969
Originally posted by Gig
Yeah, try saying that when there's a very specific list of places you can connect to with any "unknown" connections costing you far greater than anything else. (See also: Long distance calling. Seriously, what the hell? VoIP to any computer on the internet with a decent connection is free, but calling a phone is $rape/hour?)
Unfortunately true. Ultimately the best we can do is tell them to fuck off and take our business to anyone we can find who doesn't employ such nonsense. Still, until they make that leap, may as well be on the safe side and not let them see what you're doing (and maybe "accidentally" throttle access to that one video streaming site owned by their competitors).

____________________



[loading witty comment...]
Lyskar
12210
-The Chaos within trumps the Chaos without-
Level: 192


Posts: 7496/12211
EXP: 99320982
For next: 552589

Since: 07-03-07

From: 52-2-88-7

Since last post: 7.4 years
Last activity: 7.3 years

Posted on 12-27-10 02:58:35 AM Link | Quote
Stats
Time/Date
12-26-10 08:58:35 PM
Posts
7496
Days Here
1272
Level
127
Metal_Man88's Post
In the end, it'll be up to proxies and next-gen proxy stuff to thwart attempts to figure out what content people are accessing, at this rate.

____________________

Eisnaught - SSQ² - Mobius Roleplay - SSS
Gabu

Star Mario
Placeholder Ikachan until :effort: is found
Level: 172


Posts: 4337/9981
EXP: 67989290
For next: 112944

Since: 08-10-09

Pronouns: they/them, she/her
From: Santa Cruisin' USA

Since last post: 56 days
Last activity: 4 days

Posted on 12-30-10 03:36:17 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Metal_Man88
In the end, it'll be up to proxies and next-gen proxy stuff to thwart attempts to figure out what content people are accessing, at this rate.


Until proxies are banned outright.

____________________

Lyskar
12210
-The Chaos within trumps the Chaos without-
Level: 192


Posts: 7515/12211
EXP: 99320982
For next: 552589

Since: 07-03-07

From: 52-2-88-7

Since last post: 7.4 years
Last activity: 7.3 years

Posted on 12-30-10 05:25:48 AM Link | Quote
Stats
Time/Date
12-29-10 11:25:48 PM
Posts
7515
Days Here
1275
Level
127
Metal_Man88's Post
I'm afraid that's not physically possible--not without restricting the 'net to a universal whitelist, which would mean only big, official sites could be accessed anymore.

Otherwise, anyone with a domain name and a server can act as a proxy, with the right setup.

____________________

Eisnaught - SSQ² - Mobius Roleplay - SSS
Nicole

Disk-kun
Level: 146


Posts: 1973/6469
EXP: 38284718
For next: 228576

Since: 07-07-07

Pronouns: she/her
From: Boston, MA

Since last post: 78 days
Last activity: 1 day

Posted on 12-30-10 12:28:50 PM Link | Quote

Originally posted by Metal_Man88
I'm afraid that's not physically possible--not without restricting the 'net to a universal whitelist, which would mean only big, official sites could be accessed anymore.

Otherwise, anyone with a domain name and a server can act as a proxy, with the right setup.

Well, ISPs could have lists of known proxies, put a line against proxies in their TOS or whatever (no laws needed here) banning proxy servers, and then do the kind of deep packet examination being brought up here... I mean, it won't stop 100% of proxy usage by any means, but it would make it a lot less safe to do so unless you had a private one.

____________________

Lyskar
12210
-The Chaos within trumps the Chaos without-
Level: 192


Posts: 7518/12211
EXP: 99320982
For next: 552589

Since: 07-03-07

From: 52-2-88-7

Since last post: 7.4 years
Last activity: 7.3 years

Posted on 12-30-10 09:29:28 PM Link | Quote
Stats
Time/Date
12-30-10 03:29:28 PM
Posts
7518
Days Here
1276
Level
127
Metal_Man88's Post
Sure. I'm just noting that, if ISPs get too deep into it, end users are liable to begin hacking their connections to subvert it.

____________________

Eisnaught - SSQ² - Mobius Roleplay - SSS
Next newer thread | Next older thread
Jul - News - Oh hey remember that net neutrality thing New poll - New thread - New reply


Rusted Logic

Acmlmboard - commit 47be4dc [2021-08-23]
©2000-2022 Acmlm, Xkeeper, Kaito Sinclaire, et al.

30 database queries, 1 query cache hits.
Query execution time: 0.092461 seconds
Script execution time: 0.047716 seconds
Total render time: 0.140177 seconds