Register - Login
Views: 99805660
Main - Memberlist - Active users - Calendar - Wiki - IRC Chat - Online users
Ranks - Rules/FAQ - Stats - Latest Posts - Color Chart - Smilies
05-03-22 07:55:14 AM
Jul - News - North Korea attacks South Korea ... now what? New poll - New thread - New reply
Next newer thread | Next older thread
FieryIce

Luigi
Level: 119


Posts: 1233/4161
EXP: 18758323
For next: 170968

Since: 12-18-08

From: Chicago

Since last post: 188 days
Last activity: 2 days

Posted on 11-23-10 08:04:50 PM Link | Quote
North Korea: a deadly attack, a counter-strike – now Koreans hold their breath


The US and other countries around the world pleaded for restraint today after North Korea fired dozens of artillery shells at a South Korean island, killing two soldiers and injuring civilians.

With tensions running high on the peninsula, the South Korean president, Lee Myung-bak, met his top military in an underground bunker in Seoul and ordered the air force to strike North Korean missile bases if there is any further provocation.

The clash is one of the most serious since the end of the Korean war in 1953. Relations were already strained by the revelation at the weekend that North Korea has a new uranium enrichment facility.

In an immediate response to the artillery barrage, Seoul scrambled F-16 fighter jets to the western sea and returned fire.

Diplomats and analysts in Washington and elsewhere around the world warned that while neither the North nor South wanted all-out war, the risk of incidents such as today's was that it could tip the peninsula into an accidental war.

There appeared to be little appetite in either Seoul or Washington for military retaliation or a new round of sanctions.

The North, in a short statement carried by the official KCNA news agency, said the South had fired first despite repeated warnings. It threatened more strikes if the South crossed the maritime border by "even 0.001 millimetre".

The South said its troops had not been firing towards the North during their live-fire exercise, which was part of regular drills in the area.

South Korean officials said two marines were killed in the attack and 17 injured, while three civilians were wounded. A Seoul-based broadcaster showed images of smoke rising from buildings on Yeonpyeong, which lies just 75 miles west of Seoul. It is home to about 1,600 civilians and 1,000 soldiers.

Lee Chun-ok, a 54-year-old island resident, told the Associated Press she was watching TV when she heard artillery and a wall and door in her home collapsed.

"I thought I would die," said Lee, who was evacuated to the port city of Incheon. "I'm still terrified."

The president's spokeswoman Kim Hee-jung said after his meeting with military leaders: "President Lee instructed [the military] to strike North Korea's missile base near its coastline artillery positions if necessary ... if there is an indication of further provocation".

The US president, Barack Obama, who was woken just before 4am by his national security adviser, Tom Donilon, to be informed of the attack, issued a statement condemning it and planned to speak to the South Korean president late today.

Bill Burton, a White House spokesman travelling with Obama aboard Air Force One today, said: "North Korea has a pattern of doing things that are provocative. This is a particularly outrageous act." But he offered no specifics on any action.

Obama took office in January last year offering to talk directly with the North in an effort to persuade them to abandon a nuclear weapons programme, but the North has responded with missile launches, a nuclear test and the alleged torpedoing this year of a South Korean naval ship, the Cheonan, killing 46.

Some analysts saw the artillery attack as part of the North's campaign to have international sanctions withdrawn and to secure a promise of more aid in return for denuclearisation. Others saw it as a localised incident, with the North responding to military exercises by the South that had become too close.

The United Nations secretary general, Ban Ki-moon, condemned the barrage, saying: "The attack was one of the gravest incidents since the end of the Korean war." But he called for restraint.

The UN security council briefly discussed the incident but made no statement. China, North Korea's closest ally, has a veto on the security council and could block any condemnation .

In London the British foreign secretary, William Hague, urged Pyongyang to stop further "unprovoked" attacks.

Russia's foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, said there was a "colossal danger" of escalation, Reuters reported.

China steered clear of assigning blame. A foreign ministry spokesman urged both sides to "do more to contribute to peace and stability in the region".

Stephen Bosworth, the US special envoy on North Korea, who was in Beijing , told reporters he had discussed the clash with the Chinese foreign minister and they agreed both sides should show restraint.

The Pentagon played down the prospect of a military response or more sanctions. "It's hard to pile more sanctions upon the North than are already there," said Geoff Morrell, the Pentagon press secretary.

Han Seung-joo, a former South Korean foreign minister, said the attack was the most serious clash since the end of the Korean war in that it targeted land.

Han said: "It is not only because it involves civilian casualties, but the deliberateness of the bombardment."

But he added: "I don't think it will escalate into anything much more serious."

Bruce Klingner, a senior research fellow at the Asian Studies Centre, part of the Heritage Foundation, a Washington thinktank, said: "The situation on the peninsula is tense but unlikely to lead to war."

Professor Chu Shulong, an expert on international security at Beijing's Tsinghua University, said: "North Korea has always been a place that likes to make trouble to get attention from the international community ... They can start a new round of negotiations and get supplies from other countries. This is what they have been doing during the past 20 years."

Paul Stares of the Council of Foreign Relations predicted the US would put pressure on China to rein in the North, while China would urge the US to lessen military and diplomatic pressure.

Peter Beck, a research fellow with the Council, told Associated Press: "It brings us one step closer to the brink of war.

"I don't think the North would seek war by intention, but war by accident, something spiralling out of control, has always been my fear."


They have gotten away with a lot of things now ... Will there be another Korean war? Any thoughts?
Zero One
5170
And as we fall the spirit carries on,
That a hero'll come and save us all,
As we call the ones we left below,
We all dream of the day we rise above
Level: 129


Posts: 2014/5173
EXP: 24571826
For next: 477828

Since: 05-24-10

From: Delta Quadrant

Since last post: 1.6 years
Last activity: 130 days

Posted on 11-24-10 06:10:51 AM Link | Quote
I suppose M*A*S*H isn't exactly entirely truthful about the original Korean war, but I think it'd be fair to say that if it did produce another war, it'd be a lot worse.

It doesn't look like North Korea is eager for peace...

____________________
"The last Metroid is in captivity."
And yet, the galaxy is STILL fucked.
Thanks Xkeeper, Bagel and Sanky for the help!

Lyskar
12210
-The Chaos within trumps the Chaos without-
Level: 192


Posts: 7091/12211
EXP: 99321456
For next: 552115

Since: 07-03-07

From: 52-2-88-7

Since last post: 7.4 years
Last activity: 7.3 years

Posted on 11-24-10 07:58:58 PM Link | Quote
Stats
Time/Date
11-24-10 01:58:58 PM
Posts
7091
Days Here
1240
Level
123
Metal_Man88's Post
No, the war never ended, so this is just more of the same. In specific, the new Kim is going to take power, so they blow stuff up as a show of bravado.

It's the same thing they did when Kim Jong Il assumed power.

____________________

Eisnaught - SSQ² - Mobius Roleplay - SSS
Nicole

Disk-kun
Level: 146


Posts: 1525/6469
EXP: 38284901
For next: 228393

Since: 07-07-07

Pronouns: she/her
From: Boston, MA

Since last post: 78 days
Last activity: 1 day

Posted on 11-24-10 08:03:44 PM Link | Quote

Originally posted by Metal_Man88
No, the war never ended, so this is just more of the same. In specific, the new Kim is going to take power, so they blow stuff up as a show of bravado.

It's the same thing they did when Kim Jong Il assumed power.

I would think I would agree with this...

Though my biggest worry here is that Kim Jong Il knows he doesn't have much time to live, and wants to hand a united Korea to his son... that could end rather poorly. Hopefully it's just a show of force.

____________________

nensondubois
seek help please
Level: 49


Posts: 306/551
EXP: 853586
For next: 30297

Since: 05-30-10


Since last post: 7.9 years
Last activity: 7.8 years

Posted on 11-27-10 04:24:31 AM (last edited by nensondubois at 11-27-10 01:25 AM) Link | Quote
Every nation should tell them to cut the crap or they're getting nuked. Problem solved. (if only)

____________________
Tomorrow will be black and white, with a chance of grey.
http://gametz.com/user/nensondubois.html <- my game collection. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtvx8TBA5EM http://board.gscentral.org/forum.php
Let's go back to the late 80's-1990's and forget that the 21st century ever happened for the sake of our gaming, music, and reasonably sane technology.
Nicole

Disk-kun
Level: 146


Posts: 1563/6469
EXP: 38284901
For next: 228393

Since: 07-07-07

Pronouns: she/her
From: Boston, MA

Since last post: 78 days
Last activity: 1 day

Posted on 11-27-10 02:11:15 PM Link | Quote

Originally posted by nensondubois
Every nation should tell them to cut the crap or they're getting nuked. Problem solved. (if only)

Well, it's easy to say from the perspective of most of the world, but Seoul might disagree...

____________________

Viola

Level: 34


Posts: 127/228
EXP: 234138
For next: 19513

Since: 09-03-09

From: ??

Since last post: 8.1 years
Last activity: 4.8 years

Posted on 11-27-10 02:35:47 PM Link | Quote

The clash is one of the most serious since the end of the Korean war in 1953. Relations were already strained by the revelation at the weekend that North Korea has a new uranium enrichment facility.


Uh... The Korean War never ended, dumbass. It's been going on for over 57 years now, just hasn't amounted to much beyond soldiers on both sides pacing back and forth, watching each other.

____________________


Darker, hotter Captain N
Next newer thread | Next older thread
Jul - News - North Korea attacks South Korea ... now what? New poll - New thread - New reply


Rusted Logic

Acmlmboard - commit 47be4dc [2021-08-23]
©2000-2022 Acmlm, Xkeeper, Kaito Sinclaire, et al.

29 database queries.
Query execution time: 0.109814 seconds
Script execution time: 0.019007 seconds
Total render time: 0.128821 seconds