Register - Login
Views: 99869301
Main - Memberlist - Active users - Calendar - Wiki - IRC Chat - Online users
Ranks - Rules/FAQ - Stats - Latest Posts - Color Chart - Smilies
05-04-22 06:41:15 PM
Jul - Craziness Domain - Proof that -1 = 42. New poll - New thread - New reply
Pages: 1 2Next newer thread | Next older thread
Rena
I had one (1) message in Discord deleted and proceeded to make a huge, huge mess about how it was a violation of free speech and how moderators are supposed to be spam janitors and nobody should have the right to tell me not to talk about school shootings
Level: 135


Posts: 1135/5390
EXP: 29079552
For next: 255453

Since: 07-22-07

Pronouns: he/him/whatever
From: RSP Segment 6

Since last post: 343 days
Last activity: 343 days

Posted on 09-27-07 03:50:04 AM Link | Quote
JL2 - Post #1135 - 09-26-07 10:50:04 PM
Day 66, rank 7; Level 37 (12.9%)
3880/30143 (311990/338253)
GPP: 412; GT: 36.872
As we all know, the question is "2B or not 2B", and the answer is 42. (0x2B | ~0x2B) = (0x2B | 0xD4) = 0xFF = -1. Thus, -1 = 42.

____________________
Hectamatatortron
Member
Level: 35


Posts: 7/232
EXP: 258253
For next: 21683

Since: 09-19-07


Since last post: 7.2 years
Last activity: 5.3 years

Posted on 09-27-07 03:56:59 AM; last edit by Hectamatatortron on 09-27-07 03:58 AM Link | Quote
32 bit registers pwn the shit out of 8 bit registers.

42=255

Edit:

Subtract 42 from both sides

0=213

Divide both sides by 213/43

0=43

Subtract one from both sides

-1=42

Interesting predicament.
Raspberry
Thank you for my time here. I won't ever forget..
Level: 85


Posts: 150/1823
EXP: 5727678
For next: 170862

Since: 07-07-07

Pronouns: she/her

Since last post: 1.0 years
Last activity: 78 days

Posted on 09-27-07 04:08:06 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by HyperHacker
As we all know, the question is "2B or not 2B", and the answer is 42. (0x2B | ~0x2B) = (0x2B | 0xD4) = 0xFF = -1. Thus, -1 = 42.

Combine that with the proof that 1 = 2 and you can prove that 42 = both -1 and -2...

I wonder what other revelations are possible...
Sukasa

Level: 123


Posts: 59/4326
EXP: 20938577
For next: 292689

Since: 07-07-07


Since last post: 1.1 years
Last activity: 1.1 years

Posted on 09-27-07 04:08:50 AM Link | Quote
Send PM | Obligatory blank page | Megaman ZX FTW
Real Life Comics
Perfection NEO Forums
p2pnet.net

The answer to anything / 0

____________________
neotransotaku
Member
wonders why OSX does not come with their version of MSPaint?
Level: 53


Posts: 17/603
EXP: 1084844
For next: 72275

Since: 08-24-07

From: The Landmark @ One Market

Since last post: 2.6 years
Last activity: 42 days

Posted on 09-27-07 01:11:31 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Ran Yakumo
Originally posted by HyperHacker
As we all know, the question is "2B or not 2B", and the answer is 42. (0x2B | ~0x2B) = (0x2B | 0xD4) = 0xFF = -1. Thus, -1 = 42.

Combine that with the proof that 1 = 2 and you can prove that 42 = both -1 and -2...


The "proof" that 1 = 2 is flawed.

Anyways, we can say that 42 = -1 or -127 or 255 or NaN or a bazillion different things depending on the number of bits we want.

Hyperhacker, thanks for spoiling it.

Hectamatatortron
Member
Level: 35


Posts: 11/232
EXP: 258253
For next: 21683

Since: 09-19-07


Since last post: 7.2 years
Last activity: 5.3 years

Posted on 09-27-07 02:16:24 PM Link | Quote
Then there's my post, which proves that if anything equals something other than itself, it equals everything else, too. And everything else equals it. And everything else, by syllogism.

But the universe hasn't comploded yet, so I think that proves that -1!=42 right there.
Catrion
Member
You know, posting at SMWC all the time gets a bit old
Level: 21


Posts: 61/74
EXP: 46726
For next: 3217

Since: 08-03-07


Since last post: 14.5 years
Last activity: 14.5 years

Posted on 09-27-07 07:16:01 PM Link | Quote
I think 42 = 42.

____________________
Current Earth-Destruction Status
[citation needed]
Rena
I had one (1) message in Discord deleted and proceeded to make a huge, huge mess about how it was a violation of free speech and how moderators are supposed to be spam janitors and nobody should have the right to tell me not to talk about school shootings
Level: 135


Posts: 1138/5390
EXP: 29079552
For next: 255453

Since: 07-22-07

Pronouns: he/him/whatever
From: RSP Segment 6

Since last post: 343 days
Last activity: 343 days

Posted on 09-27-07 07:42:58 PM Link | Quote
JL2 - Post #1138 - 09-27-07 02:42:58 PM
Day 67, rank 7; Level 37 (22.1%)
6670/30143 (314780/338253)
GPP: 414; GT: 36.908
Originally posted by Hectamatatortron
32 bit registers pwn the shit out of 8 bit registers.

42=255
Yes, I was going to point out that the specifics would be different in 32-bit, but the result would be the same anyway.

____________________
Deleted User
Collection of nobodies
Posted on 10-06-07 03:03:42 PM Link | Quote
Is that me, or i'm starting to have an headache?

____________________


===================
[Posted by Diglidi-Dude]
Kernal
Member
Huh?
Level: 24


Posts: 2/96
EXP: 68630
For next: 9495

Since: 10-07-07

From: Michigan - leaving next year

Since last post: 14.5 years
Last activity: 14.4 years

Posted on 10-07-07 01:24:22 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Hectamatatortron
But the universe hasn't comploded yet, so I think that proves that -1!=42 right there.


-1! can't equal 42, because you can't have the factorial of -1. (Yes, I know you meant not equal to)

Me, I'm still trying to add infinity and 1.
Nicole

Disk-kun
Level: 146


Posts: 595/6469
EXP: 38290022
For next: 223272

Since: 07-07-07

Pronouns: she/her
From: Boston, MA

Since last post: 79 days
Last activity: 20 hours

Posted on 10-07-07 01:24:59 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by comm128
Originally posted by Hectamatatortron
But the universe hasn't comploded yet, so I think that proves that -1!=42 right there.


-1! can't equal 42, because you can't have the factorial of -1. (Yes, I know you meant not equal to)

Me, I'm still trying to add infinity and 1.

Infinity plus one equals negative infinity- it just loops around, right?

____________________
Kernal
Member
Huh?
Level: 24


Posts: 3/96
EXP: 68630
For next: 9495

Since: 10-07-07

From: Michigan - leaving next year

Since last post: 14.5 years
Last activity: 14.4 years

Posted on 10-07-07 01:29:48 AM Link | Quote
Well, sometimes it looks like it (as in the graph for 1/x). Really, infinity is a mathematical concept but not a number. If it were a number, you could say stuff like:
∞ + 1 = ∞ + 2
(subtracting ∞ from both sides)
1 = 2
Hectamatatortron
Member
Level: 35


Posts: 21/232
EXP: 258253
For next: 21683

Since: 09-19-07


Since last post: 7.2 years
Last activity: 5.3 years

Posted on 10-07-07 06:02:25 PM; last edit by Hectamatatortron on 10-07-07 06:11 PM Link | Quote
My ARM floating point functions say that infinity + (positive number) = infinity.

I followed the 754 standard, it has to be right! D:

Unfortunately, they also say that infinity - infinity = NaN.

>.>

Also, 4! = 4*(next integer closest to one, repeat until *1)

So -1! could possibly maybe be -1*0*1 = 0?

0 = 42?

0*43/32 = 42*43/42?

-1 = 42?

I found a better one, though. Someone actually thought this was one of the valid proofs that 1 = .999... Yes, 1 does = .999..., but this is not why:

10x = 9.99999999...

Presume x = .9999...

10x-x = 9.999... - .999...

9x = 9

x = 1 = .999...; x = .999... is a valid solution.

But then wouldn't that mean that

10x = 9.5

x = .5 = 1, for x = (rvalue - (lvalue - x), as demonstrated by the previous proof?
Deleted User
Collection of nobodies
Posted on 10-07-07 06:37:55 PM; last edit by NightKev on 10-07-07 07:40 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by comm128
Well, sometimes it looks like it (as in the graph for 1/x). Really, infinity is a mathematical concept but not a number. If it were a number, you could say stuff like:
∞ + 1 = ∞ + 2
(subtracting ∞ from both sides)
1 = 2
Except, that's like saying "4 + 1 = 4 + 2" then, so your 1 = 2 fails. (If infinity is a number just like 3, then it works like a number)
@hectawhatever(your name is wtf): You're jumping all around everywhere and it's hard to know wtf your post is saying.

____________________


===================
[Posted by NightKev]
Joe
Common spammer
🍬
Level: 111


Posts: 122/3392
EXP: 14503158
For next: 365202

Since: 08-02-07

From: Pororoca

Since last post: 13 days
Last activity: 1 hour

Posted on 10-07-07 07:27:13 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Hectamatatortron
I found a better one, though. Someone actually thought this was one of the valid proofs that 1 = .999... Yes, 1 does = .999..., but this is not why:

10x = 9.99999999...

Presume x = .9999...

10x-x = 9.999... - .999...

9x = 9

x = 1 = .999...; x = .999... is a valid solution.

But then wouldn't that mean that

10x = 9.5

x = .5 = 1, for x = (rvalue - (lvalue - x), as demonstrated by the previous proof?

Well, let's have a look:

1/9 = 0.1111111111...
Therefore:
9/9 = 0.9999999999...
However:
9/9 = 1

We know what 1/9 is, so we should know what 9/9 is. But calculating 9/9 gives a different answer.

For the same reason, where you said 9x = 9, it also equals 8.999..., depending on how you get your answer. And, 10x does not equal 9.5 unless you rounded somewhere along the way.

It's interesting to note that this problem doesn't happen in some number systems other than base-10, but who uses base-3?

____________________
Woah... If you look, every thread by Anya starts with the "" icon. Was that intentional?
Rena
I had one (1) message in Discord deleted and proceeded to make a huge, huge mess about how it was a violation of free speech and how moderators are supposed to be spam janitors and nobody should have the right to tell me not to talk about school shootings
Level: 135


Posts: 1253/5390
EXP: 29079552
For next: 255453

Since: 07-22-07

Pronouns: he/him/whatever
From: RSP Segment 6

Since last post: 343 days
Last activity: 343 days

Posted on 10-07-07 07:37:07 PM Link | Quote
JL2 - Post #1253 - 10-07-07 02:37:07 PM
Day 77, rank 7; Level 39 (56.3%)
19333/34324 (389780/404771)
GPP: 466; GT: 34.238
Originally posted by NightKev
Except, that's like saying "3 + 1 = 3 + 2" then, so your 1 = 2 fails. (If infinity is a number just like 3, then it works like a number)
@hectawhatever(your name is wtf): You're jumping all around everywhere and it's hard to know wtf your post is saying.
*mandatory "3 IS NOT A NUMBER" comment*

____________________
Deleted User
Collection of nobodies
Posted on 10-07-07 07:41:05 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by HyperHacker
Originally posted by NightKev
Except, that's like saying "3 + 1 = 3 + 2" then, so your 1 = 2 fails. (If infinity is a number just like 3, then it works like a number)
@hectawhatever(your name is wtf): You're jumping all around everywhere and it's hard to know wtf your post is saying.
*mandatory "3 IS NOT A NUMBER" comment*
Post edited.

____________________


===================
[Posted by NightKev]
Kernal
Member
Huh?
Level: 24


Posts: 15/96
EXP: 68630
For next: 9495

Since: 10-07-07

From: Michigan - leaving next year

Since last post: 14.5 years
Last activity: 14.4 years

Posted on 10-07-07 10:17:15 PM Link | Quote
Uh, that's the point. It fails, because infinity isn't a number.
Rena
I had one (1) message in Discord deleted and proceeded to make a huge, huge mess about how it was a violation of free speech and how moderators are supposed to be spam janitors and nobody should have the right to tell me not to talk about school shootings
Level: 135


Posts: 1261/5390
EXP: 29079552
For next: 255453

Since: 07-22-07

Pronouns: he/him/whatever
From: RSP Segment 6

Since last post: 343 days
Last activity: 343 days

Posted on 10-08-07 07:41:15 AM Link | Quote
JL2 - Post #1261 - 10-08-07 02:41:15 AM
Day 77, rank 7; Level 39 (70.9%)
24351/34324 (394798/404771)
GPP: 469; GT: 34.023
I found another one.
You all know "7 8 9".
You are what you eat.
Therefore, 7 = 9.

____________________
Sunny

Level: 115


Posts: 149/3675
EXP: 16369714
For next: 441650

Since: 07-23-07


Since last post: 4.2 years
Last activity: 190 days

Posted on 10-11-07 01:38:41 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by HyperHacker
I found another one.
You all know "7 8 9".
You are what you eat.
Therefore, 7 = 9.

But if 7 8 9, 7 would gain the weight of 9, so wouldn't it actually be 7 > 9?
Or would you rather tell me what that Q.E.D. meant on the 2=1 page?

____________________
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Posts = 149
Age = 79
Lv 15
Exp 16191 / 16384
LvExp 3120 / 3313 (94.2%)
PostExp = 162
ExpTime = 845.797
Pages: 1 2Next newer thread | Next older thread
Jul - Craziness Domain - Proof that -1 = 42. New poll - New thread - New reply


Rusted Logic

Acmlmboard - commit 47be4dc [2021-08-23]
©2000-2022 Acmlm, Xkeeper, Kaito Sinclaire, et al.

34 database queries, 4 query cache hits.
Query execution time: 0.106179 seconds
Script execution time: 0.039995 seconds
Total render time: 0.146174 seconds