|
— Anya —
Trudging Scribe Post 18543/23359 
|
| |||||||||||
|
 Register - Login | |||||
|
Main
- Memberlist
- Active users
- Calendar
- Wiki
- IRC Chat
- Online users Ranks - Rules/FAQ - Stats - Latest Posts - Color Chart - Smilies |
|
| | ||
Register - Login | |||||
|
Main
- Memberlist
- Active users
- Calendar
- Wiki
- IRC Chat
- Online users Ranks - Rules/FAQ - Stats - Latest Posts - Color Chart - Smilies |
|
| | ||
| Jul - General Chat - Lets complain about the new Google Image Search |
 -  -  |
| Pages: 1 2 | Next newer thread | Next older thread |
|
— Anya —
Trudging Scribe Post 18543/23359
|
| |||||||||||
|
Gabu Star Mario Placeholder Ikachan until :effort: is found Level: 172      Posts: 3432/9981 EXP: 67989580 For next: 112654 Since: 08-10-09 Pronouns: they/them, she/her From: Santa Cruisin' USA Since last post: 56 days Last activity: 4 days
|
| ||
|
|
NightKev 20  Level: 13  Posts: 24/24 EXP: 8279 For next: 1988 Since: 10-04-08 From: California Since last post: 11.8 years Last activity: 11.8 years
|
|
Didn't sankakucomplex.com's image search thing do this first?
This seems like a nice feature, for those of us who like to be lazy at least. ____________________ |
|
Vinnyboiler Catgirl Level: 66  Posts: 422/1045 EXP: 2445467 For next: 16384 Since: 12-27-07 From: London, England Since last post: 6 days Last activity: 2 days
|
|
Originally posted by Gabu Google are dicks as you ether have to get used to thier new style or use new image search |
FieryIce Luigi Level: 119  Posts: 1059/4161 EXP: 18758300 For next: 170991 Since: 12-18-08 From: Chicago Since last post: 188 days Last activity: 2 days
|
|
| I actually like the new style, I find it much more convenient. I do wish there was a way to go directly to the image. |
|
Vinnyboiler Catgirl Level: 66 Posts: 427/1045 EXP: 2445467 For next: 16384 Since: 12-27-07 From: London, England Since last post: 6 days Last activity: 2 days
|
|
Don't get me wong, I like the new Google image search, I just wish that all Google products (like Youtube) should have the option to switch to the back to the old website insted of get rid of it compleatly  . |
Orlandu Holy SwordsMan Level: 137  Posts: 2454/5913 EXP: 30478825 For next: 394030 Since: 01-12-10 From: Las Vegas, NV Since last post: 4.0 years Last activity: 208 days
|
| |||||||||||
|
|
Gabu Star Mario Placeholder Ikachan until :effort: is found Level: 172 Posts: 3440/9981 EXP: 67989580 For next: 112654 Since: 08-10-09 Pronouns: they/them, she/her From: Santa Cruisin' USA Since last post: 56 days Last activity: 4 days
|
| ||
|
|
Flying Omelette Member Green-handled, pearl-encrusted abelnuski Level: 35  Posts: 22/257 EXP: 272259 For next: 7677 Since: 05-19-10 From: Ohio Since last post: 11.2 years Last activity: 10.9 years
|
|
| On my monitor, the search results look like a train wreck and when I click on a picture to go to the page it's from, Google puts the image over the page and blows it up so it looks horribly pixelated. |
Peardian Magikoopa 16/3/1: KvSG #479 is up! Level: 157  Posts: 3563/7597 EXP: 48603023 For next: 976210 Since: 08-02-07 From: Isle Delfino Since last post: 10 days Last activity: 13 hours
|
| |
|
|
Flying Omelette Member Green-handled, pearl-encrusted abelnuski Level: 35 Posts: 26/257 EXP: 272259 For next: 7677 Since: 05-19-10 From: Ohio Since last post: 11.2 years Last activity: 10.9 years
|
|
| Although I do find it amusing that my Pepper is in the top results for "red patch tabby". |
Midiman Level: 13 Posts: 8/24 EXP: 7944 For next: 2323 Since: 11-02-09 Since last post: 10.6 years Last activity: 10.5 years
|
|
| new google search is fine.
I have no problems with it. I actually prefer the way it hides content of some websites and just shows the picture. |
|
Zero One 5170   And as we fall the spirit carries on, That a hero'll come and save us all, As we call the ones we left below, We all dream of the day we rise above Level: 129  Posts: 1115/5173 EXP: 24571792 For next: 477862 Since: 05-24-10 From: Delta Quadrant Since last post: 1.6 years Last activity: 130 days
|
| |
|
|
Originally posted by Midiman Same here. It's quite nice (even though I do primarily use Bing.) And the new sorting filters are nice as well. ____________________ |
|
Flying Omelette Member Green-handled, pearl-encrusted abelnuski Level: 35 Posts: 45/257 EXP: 272259 For next: 7677 Since: 05-19-10 From: Ohio Since last post: 11.2 years Last activity: 10.9 years
|
|
Originally posted by Midiman Personally, I don't. One of my subdomains (raugallery) gets a lot of hits off people searching images and unless they're looking for pictures of the actual characters, there's no real reason to be getting images from there. Any images on that site could just as easily be found elsewhere, and people taking them from there without viewing the pages does not benefit the site in any way. I'm going to have to see if I can write a script that will block Google Images from taking from that subdomain, which they really have no business doing anyway since they disapprove pretty heavily of the site's content. |
|
Rena I had one (1) message in Discord deleted and proceeded to make a huge, huge mess about how it was a violation of free speech and how moderators are supposed to be spam janitors and nobody should have the right to tell me not to talk about school shootings Level: 135 Posts: 3506/5390 EXP: 29075619 For next: 259386 Since: 07-22-07 Pronouns: he/him/whatever From: RSP Segment 6 Since last post: 342 days Last activity: 342 days
|
|
08-03-10 04:58:53 AM Post #3506 Well you can use robots.txt to prevent it from even indexing that subdomain, or you can use some stupid hack that does nothing but annoy your potential users.
Does it actually link directly to the images now? I didn't think they'd ever really do that for fear of people getting a bug up their butt and/or broken "anti-leeching" systems that don't work well with Google. There are of course plenty of Greasemonkey scripts to do this (and RefControl, AdBlock and NoScript to deal with shitty anti-leech systems). ____________________ ![[loading witty comment...]](http://twitstamp.com/custom-2013.png "this is about the only use for Twitter") why not? |
|
Flying Omelette Member Green-handled, pearl-encrusted abelnuski Level: 35 Posts: 46/257 EXP: 272259 For next: 7677 Since: 05-19-10 From: Ohio Since last post: 11.2 years Last activity: 10.9 years
|
|
| If Google gave as many hits to the site on their main search engine as they do off the image search, I wouldn't care about it, but they won't (for reasons I won't go into here - I have an ongoing feud with Google that I don't wish to drag anyone else into).
The biggest problem is that my stats system (which is usually good for most things) does not list the search terms for image searches, so in general I can't tell what people are looking for there. But whenever someone tries to hotlink an image on another message board, blog, or website, it's almost always one of the "meme" pics that can be found a billion other places (like the CDi drawing of Link or the facepalm montage). |
|
Lyskar 12210  -The Chaos within trumps the Chaos without- Level: 192  Posts: 6207/12211 EXP: 99321345 For next: 552226 Since: 07-03-07 From: 52-2-88-7 Since last post: 7.4 years Last activity: 7.3 years
|
| |||||||||
|
||||||||||
| Pages: 1 2 | Next newer thread | Next older thread |
| Jul - General Chat - Lets complain about the new Google Image Search |
- - |
|
Acmlmboard - commit 47be4dc [2021-08-23]
©2000-2022 Acmlm, Xkeeper, Kaito Sinclaire, et al. 
|
