Jul -- General Chat: New Bin-Laden video.

Shadic
Alakadoof?
Level: 151

Posts: 762/6929
EXP: 42377840
For next: 918636

Since: 07-22-07

Pronouns: he/him
From: Olympia, WA

Since last post: 5 days
Last activity: 14 hours

Posted on 09-09-07 06:09:19 AM

Link | Quote

Sadly, it seems like most all higher-tier Politics are just jokes now. The Democrats got elected to stop the crap that's been happening, and yet they've done.. Nothing? Hell, the approved the new wiretapping bill!

However, the point of "Drop the Democratic Party or the war will continue." Is bullshit. What party was in control for the majority of Bush's presidency? And hell, the Democrat's "Majority" is tiny anyways.

____________________

Xkeeper

Level: 263

Posts: 2899/25353
EXP: 297142128
For next: 1818325

Since: 07-03-07

Pronouns: they/them/????????

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 1 hour

Posted on 09-09-07 06:40:23 AM

Link | Quote

Daily Cycle II ~ 2899

Yes, because everybody knows Bin Laden is the commander of every terrorist ever.

This video is worthless.

____________________
(If you need to talk to me on AIM, PM me first, since I'll be off my regular account for at least a few hours, if not a few days)

Stats

Level 55
EXP: 52908/80319
Time: 67 days
Ranked at #1

Kles

Level: 87

Posts: 700/1947
EXP: 6311935
For next: 80839

Since: 07-23-07

Since last post: 78 days
Last activity: 4 days

Posted on 09-09-07 06:43:30 AM

Link | Quote


	I have my doubts about whether this is even the real bin Laden. ____________________ ؟

Xkeeper

Level: 263

Posts: 2900/25353
EXP: 297142128
For next: 1818325

Since: 07-03-07

Pronouns: they/them/????????

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 1 hour

Posted on 09-09-07 06:46:19 AM

Link | Quote

Daily Cycle II ~ 2900

Originally posted by Kles
I have my doubts about whether this is even the real bin Laden.

will the real bin Laden please stand u-- *shot*

I would have to agree, though.

____________________
(If you need to talk to me on AIM, PM me first, since I'll be off my regular account for at least a few hours, if not a few days)

Stats

Level 55
EXP: 53613/80319
Time: 67 days
Ranked at #1

Hiryuu

Level: 207

Posts: 859/14435
EXP: 127622515
For next: 2161639

Since: 07-06-07

Since last post: 11.8 years
Last activity: 11.7 years

Posted on 09-09-07 06:48:59 AM

Link | Quote

Simplicity v1.1

Originally posted by Kles
I have my doubts about whether this is even the real bin Laden.

So does Rush. That was the big thing on the radio on Friday.

And the over-repetitiveness about the whole beard deal.

DYED HIS BEARD
DYED HIS BEARD
DYED HIS BEARD
IT LOOKS LIKE HE DYED HIS BEARD
DYED HIS BEARD
DYED HIS BEARD
DYED HIS BEARD
HE LOOKS YOUNGER NOW CUZ *hsk*

____________________

StatisticsLevel:

HP:

MP:

Day:

Rank:

InsertNameHere
Member
Pass changed
Level: 39

Posts: 133/299
EXP: 379233
For next: 25538

Since: 08-10-07

Since last post: 14.3 years
Last activity: 14.3 years

Posted on 09-09-07 07:01:07 AM

Link | Quote


Originally posted by Biospark Yes, because everybody knows Bin Laden is the commander of every terrorist ever. This video is worthless. Yeah, and yet he claims burning people is against his religion... He makes no sense whatsoever. ____________________ This layout has been endorsed by the Dark Empress, Queen of the Universe, Ranko-sama and therefore does not, in any given way, suck. Or so I'm supposed to say. Better Days

wowfunhappy
Member
Level: 16

Posts: 7/40
EXP: 18502
For next: 1754

Since: 09-10-07

Since last post: 13.0 years
Last activity: 13.0 years

Posted on 09-11-07 11:19:17 PM

Link | Quote

Originally posted by Kles
I have my doubts about whether this is even the real bin Laden.

We were discussing this in school, (Discussing politics is part of my school) and my teacher told us that the [US military-thing the name escapes me... is it called the Pentagon?] has stated that the guy in the video is the real Bin Laden.

Of course, the [Pentagon?] hasn't exactly done to well with the iraq war. Not sure I trust them.

Although the democrats rule two branches of our government, they can't do much about the war with the president in the way. The writers of our constitution gave the president a lot of power, in my opinion to much power. Also, the checks-and-balances system our government is based on only allows one branch to STOP another branch from doing something, they cannot actually MAKE another branch do something.

The president cannot declare war, Only congress can. But once war is declared, it's in the hands of the president. As long as the president is in office, he's the one in control of the war. The democrats can't do anything.

Lyskar
12210

-The Chaos within trumps the Chaos without-
Level: 192

Posts: 606/12211
EXP: 99321491
For next: 552080

Since: 07-03-07

From: 52-2-88-7

Since last post: 7.4 years
Last activity: 7.3 years

Posted on 09-12-07 07:25:52 AM

Link | Quote

09-12-07 01:25:52 AM 606 posts 70 days		Has too much free time 600
Democrats have no control because the President simply vetoes everything. This kind of thing has happened before. Also, we ended a war like this, Vietnam. All it takes is something really stupid to cause people to riot, and then the President shall stop. As for Bin Laden, what he says is meaningless babble, and always has been. They're so splintered that I've heard of cases where terrorists fight terrorists. Indeed, the formation of a new HQ in the lawless Pakistan area is something to worry about, but naturally 'Operation: Save Iraq from itself" is too busy failing for us to do anything about that. If I were Bush, I'd use the Soviet occupation of Afganistan for clues; I.E. give the Iraq government a "Tough, Save yourselves" speech and leave them to do so. If they were intended to exist, they'd be able to fight the terrorists. Otherwise? Let their own people fix it, it isn't our business to mess with them, just as much as it wasn't theirs to mess with ours. As usual, we speak of politicans, a vile breed of American created to bend into many shapes to fit the voters, then go mad with power once they have it and make a hideous mess until another one is elected in their place. The sole saving grace is that the machine is programmed to discharge such people before they can turn a little 8-year thing into a 20-year dynasty. These issues are largely moot, with our problems at home, but nobody cares about those anymore, so I think sooner or later I'll be moving out of this country. Rather escape before the economy is destroyed by monopolies/cartels, medicare explodes, taxes skyrocket from poorly controlled Social Security legislation, and the rich-poor gap becomes unbearable. It's just dumb, stupid. We need to unite if we are to live as a superpower--otherwise we're no better than the factionalist extremists we claim to protect the world from. ____________________
Bisquit: "Yes, take that Bisquit! Stop hotlinking images from Bisquit's server, Bisquit! You evil retard!"

Nicole

she's more meow now than man, twisted and evil

Disk-kun
Level: 146

Posts: 488/6469
EXP: 38284915
For next: 228379

Since: 07-07-07

Pronouns: she/her
From: Boston, MA

Since last post: 78 days
Last activity: 1 day

Posted on 09-12-07 08:32:34 PM

Link | Quote

Originally posted by wowfunhappy

Although the democrats rule two branches of our government, they can't do much about the war with the president in the way. The writers of our constitution gave the president a lot of power, in my opinion to much power. Also, the checks-and-balances system our government is based on only allows one branch to STOP another branch from doing something, they cannot actually MAKE another branch do something.

The president cannot declare war, Only congress can. But once war is declared, it's in the hands of the president. As long as the president is in office, he's the one in control of the war. The democrats can't do anything.

1) Two branches of government? I believe the Republicans hold the Executive Branch, the Democrats hold the Legislative, and the Supreme Court is theoretically non-partisan but has a conservative-leaning majority... Is there some sort of fourth branch I've never heard of?

2) True enough, but no technical "declaration of war" has been passed since WW2.

____________________

☺

Sine
2310

Level: 94

Posts: 410/2316
EXP: 8200647
For next: 156010

Since: 07-07-07

Since last post: 3.7 years
Last activity: 289 days

Posted on 09-12-07 08:37:01 PM; last edit by Kattwah on 09-12-07 08:37 PM

Link | Quote

It's a layout... that I worked hard on. ^_^
----------------------------------------------------

Originally posted by Imajin
1) Two branches of government? I believe the Republicans hold the Executive Branch, the Democrats hold the Legislative, and the Supreme Court is theoretically non-partisan but has a conservative-leaning majority... Is there some sort of fourth branch I've never heard of?

There's technically three, but political specialists consider the bureaucracy as some sort of "fourth branch", if only for their sheer influence.

____________________
Something goes here... eventually...

Register - Login
Views: 99806036	Main - Memberlist - Active users - Calendar - Wiki - IRC Chat - Online users Ranks - Rules/FAQ - Stats - Latest Posts - Color Chart - Smilies	05-03-22 08:00:45 AM

Query execution time:	0.102623 seconds
Script execution time:	0.027601 seconds
Total render time:	0.130224 seconds