I'm on Debian right now, but it's giving me some problems and I really dislike their policy on software updates. It's either stick with software that's 18 months out of date, or have the absolute bleeding-edge likely-to-spontaneously-break version of
everything.
It seems like it's an unusual and to some even unreasonable request to have the latest tested stable versions of things, but be notified when a new, untested version of a program is out, and have the
option of upgrading to it, with the ability to roll back if it turns out to be a turd. You'd think this would be a pretty common request.
I guess Arch is supposed to be like that, but in trying to get it to install in an encrypted filesystem, all I managed to do was put it in an infinite loop a few times and crash it.
I left Ubuntu because the 9.10 "upgrade" just broke the hell out of all sorts of things and 9.04 was getting horribly out of date. Way to test there guys.
____________________