Jul -- News: Spokane - Detergent is illegal

— Anya —

Trudging Scribe

Post 3905/23359

Posted on 04-01-09 04:27:38 PM


Really? Wow, just wow. The times we live in... ____________________

Tina
Beep boop
Level: 79

Posts: 1078/1549
EXP: 4472104
For next: 107363

Since: 08-10-07

Since last post: 3.4 years
Last activity: 3.4 years

Posted on 04-01-09 04:29:21 PM

Link | Quote

You guys didn't know? Haha, this place banned detergent a while ago. Namely, the stuff with phosphates.

BMF took a trip to Coeur d'Alene (or whatever, in Idaho) last week and picked up some more since we're running low.

Naturally, everybody's been pissed.

The whole thing about this was Dr. Environmentalist though that most of the phosphates in Spokane River came from here... well, no. A lot of them come from Idaho, too, making the ban completely fucking worthless, not to mention that even the developers of these products were warning them they had no (good) substitute ready.

____________________

Hiryuu

Level: 207

Posts: 7870/14435
EXP: 127636193
For next: 2147961

Since: 07-06-07

Since last post: 11.8 years
Last activity: 11.7 years

Posted on 04-01-09 04:29:26 PM

Link | Quote

This eco-friendly environmentalist crap is getting VERY old.

You won't be able to get anything you want anymore with the way things are going.

____________________

Lyskar
12210

-The Chaos within trumps the Chaos without-
Level: 192

Posts: 2357/12211
EXP: 99332130
For next: 541441

Since: 07-03-07

From: 52-2-88-7

Since last post: 7.4 years
Last activity: 7.3 years

Posted on 04-02-09 06:00:50 AM

Link | Quote

Time/Date

04-02-09 12:00:50am

Posts

2357

Days Here

638

Level

70

	Metal_Man88
	Local Moderator

I'm amazed California didn't do this first. Our emissions laws basically neutered/slaughtered any performance cars being made here when it was first introduced.

Of course, when YELLOW GAS COMES FROM THE SKIES AND BURNS YOU it makes sense.

Unlike the phosphate thing. I think they should make it more like 5.0, not 0.5. Maybe give coupons to aid in obtaining water softeners.

Or just develop better freaking detergent.

____________________

Original Layout © Tobias Kelmandia

— FPzero —
9590

Post 2972/9597
Active 5.5 years ago

Posted on 04-02-09 06:12:27 AM

Link | Quote

I'm all for a greener environment but seriously, this sort of stuff is just dumb. If you're going to make your products eco-friendly, make sure the fucking product does its job.

____________________

Hiryuu

Level: 207

Posts: 7885/14435
EXP: 127636193
For next: 2147961

Since: 07-06-07

Since last post: 11.8 years
Last activity: 11.7 years

Posted on 04-02-09 10:21:46 AM (last edited by Sakura at 04-02-09 07:22 AM)

Link | Quote

And you wonder why alternative energy is having problems...

But hey that doesn't stop them from closing off vasts amounts of lands for domestic oil and now the off-shore drilling's going south. GM's taken over, so there's most of your Trucks/SUVs that are worth it gone...and of course that makes it more government-dependent when it hits 4 bucks a gallon again this year when our dependency on foreign oil shoots up this summer. You're not going to have the freedom to get much of anything if this keeps up.

Like I said...this environment-friendly movement can really suck it. Gore can suck it...shit...we're in a global cooling...not warming.

____________________

emcee
Member
Level: 37

Posts: 74/267
EXP: 320001
For next: 18252

Since: 08-11-07

Since last post: 12.9 years
Last activity: 12.7 years

Posted on 04-03-09 03:44:11 AM

Link | Quote

I guess I'm the only one who thinks this is a good idea. Right now there's no phosphate free detergent that works well because no incentive create one. As long as the normal stuff is available, most people will just buy that. Make phosphate free detergents mandatory, and every manufacture will be racing to be the first one to develop something that actually works.

Doesn't really work on a small scale like this, since people will just go one county over, but you have to start somewhere.

Tina
Beep boop
Level: 79

Posts: 1156/1549
EXP: 4472104
For next: 107363

Since: 08-10-07

Since last post: 3.4 years
Last activity: 3.4 years

Posted on 04-03-09 03:46:15 AM

Link | Quote

Originally posted by emcee
I guess I'm the only one who thinks this is a good idea. Right now there's no phosphate free detergent that works well because no incentive create one. As long as the normal stuff is available, most people will just buy that. Make phosphate free detergents mandatory, and every manufacture will be racing to be the first one to develop something that actually works.

Doesn't really work on a small scale like this, since people will just go one county over, but you have to start somewhere.

Yes, you are. There's a reason the rest of the country agreed to delay it for a year -- explicitly so that they actually had a chance to develop something instead of SURPRISE, NO PHOSPHATES!.

You have to actually live here to know how bad the outrage was... pretty much in every paper. The fact it did absolutely fucking nothing to curb "phosphates in the river, onoz" sure helped, too.

____________________

emcee
Member
Level: 37

Posts: 75/267
EXP: 320001
For next: 18252

Since: 08-11-07

Since last post: 12.9 years
Last activity: 12.7 years

Posted on 04-03-09 03:49:47 AM

Link | Quote

I guess so, because from here it just sounds like a bunch of whining. I don't even have a dishwasher, and I get by fine.

Tina
Beep boop
Level: 79

Posts: 1157/1549
EXP: 4472104
For next: 107363

Since: 08-10-07

Since last post: 3.4 years
Last activity: 3.4 years

Posted on 04-03-09 04:11:17 AM

Link | Quote

Originally posted by emcee
I guess so, because from here it just sounds like a bunch of whining. I don't even have a dishwasher, and I get by fine.

Try telling that to someone who paid for a dishwasher (or pays for one as part of the general rent). Yeah.

____________________

emcee
Member
Level: 37

Posts: 76/267
EXP: 320001
For next: 18252

Since: 08-11-07

Since last post: 12.9 years
Last activity: 12.7 years

Posted on 04-03-09 04:18:02 AM (last edited by emcee at 04-03-09 01:18 AM)

Link | Quote

Originally posted by Tina
Try telling that to someone who paid for a dishwasher (or pays for one as part of the general rent). Yeah.

Did you pay for one, or do you pay for one as part of your rent? If so, I guess I'm telling that to you.

Hiryuu

Level: 207

Posts: 7915/14435
EXP: 127636193
For next: 2147961

Since: 07-06-07

Since last post: 11.8 years
Last activity: 11.7 years

Posted on 04-03-09 10:24:44 AM (last edited by Sakura at 04-03-09 07:25 AM)

Link | Quote

This is a key reason why people won't understand the 'rage against government' or whatever for any particular purpose.

'Well, it doesn't affect me, so why should I care?'

Same reason why non-smokers don't care about a 60 cent hike for cigarettes, the largest ever made AND bigger than the other seven that have gone through. Only when it affects you will people be pissed it seems...but don't worry, there seems to be a growing amount of reasons as of late so I'm sure you'll find something.

And hey...make sure you thank your smokers the next time you go out...since most of that money will go to health care and saving the children and whatnot. They are giving up about 38 billion dollars in the next 5 years to that alone so...

Fact of the matter is, they're going about the greener movement in the fashion of 'you have no choice' or 'let's belittle the people that aren't green because you're OOOOOOOOOO EVIL' even IF what they propose doesn't work or is worse than what we're already in. If they've got a more efficient way of doing things that doesn't lose out and is BETTER than I don't think anyone...ANYONE...has a problem with such a thing. I don't think there's a single person here that wants their environment to erode; hell, we all live here. But when there's movement like this that seeks to blame a lot of people more than fix things then it gets us nowhere.

The detergent is just one facet of things royally screwed in the greener movement...but hey, you know, we're too incompetent to know any better so we'll just let the government sort out what we need to use and do for the rest of our days. People couldn't really care on the majority if it doesn't affect them.

And that's exactly why nothing ever gets taken down against this movement. At least on their end they have a lot of proactive people doing whatever they want. The only time there's really any major opposition is when people get pissed, it lasts a short amount of time...and then they just take it up the ass and get used to it.

Same goes for cigarettes, oil drilling, health care, what have you. It's all on the government so let them do everything for you.

If you couldn't guess, I don't like that idea in the least. They do most of the 'fucking it up' anyways...regardless of who's in the hot seat for party.

____________________

Tina
Beep boop
Level: 79

Posts: 1169/1549
EXP: 4472104
For next: 107363

Since: 08-10-07

Since last post: 3.4 years
Last activity: 3.4 years

Posted on 04-03-09 10:50:29 AM

Link | Quote

Originally posted by Sakura
And hey...make sure you thank your smokers the next time you go out...since most of that money will go to health care and saving the children and whatnot. They are giving up about 38 billion dollars in the next 5 years to that alone so...

That can go to research on fixing things like, uh, lung cancer, or improving services to treat it, among a million other things. It's really not some sort of money drain.

Fact of the matter is, they're going about the greener movement in the fashion of 'you have no choice' or 'let's belittle the people that aren't green because you're OOOOOOOOOO EVIL' even IF what they propose doesn't work or is worse than what we're already in. If they've got a more efficient way of doing things that doesn't lose out and is BETTER than I don't think anyone...ANYONE...has a problem with such a thing. I don't think there's a single person here that wants their environment to erode; hell, we all live here. But when there's movement like this that seeks to blame a lot of people more than fix things then it gets us nowhere.

The problem is that nobody is doing anything about it. I'm all for this, really, it's just that nobody listened when everybody was telling them to wait.

Though on that end, it was really more of just a sort of spot check to see what would happen.

Same goes for cigarettes, oil drilling, health care, what have you. It's all on the government so let them do everything for you.

If you couldn't guess, I don't like that idea in the least. They do most of the 'fucking it up' anyways...regardless of who's in the hot seat for party.

You must be pretty far on the right, since all I'm getting out of you is that "no government at all" mentality. Eh.

____________________

Hiryuu

Level: 207

Posts: 7927/14435
EXP: 127636193
For next: 2147961

Since: 07-06-07

Since last post: 11.8 years
Last activity: 11.7 years

Posted on 04-03-09 12:05:38 PM

Link | Quote

Originally posted by Tina
You must be pretty far on the right, since all I'm getting out of you is that "no government at all" mentality. Eh.

No, that'd be anarchy. That'd be even worse.

____________________

emcee
Member
Level: 37

Posts: 79/267
EXP: 320001
For next: 18252

Since: 08-11-07

Since last post: 12.9 years
Last activity: 12.7 years

Posted on 04-03-09 12:17:35 PM

Link | Quote

Originally posted by Sakura
This is a key reason why people won't understand the 'rage against government' or whatever for any particular purpose.

'Well, it doesn't affect me, so why should I care?'

Actually that's exactly right. People don't care if their environment is being destroyed if it isn't immediately effecting them. They especially don't care if it won't effect them at all, but instead will effect their children. Make them use slightly less effective dish washer detergent for a little while, though...

Hiryuu

Level: 207

Posts: 7932/14435
EXP: 127636193
For next: 2147961

Since: 07-06-07

Since last post: 11.8 years
Last activity: 11.7 years

Posted on 04-03-09 12:22:27 PM

Link | Quote

Originally posted by emcee
Actually that's exactly right. People don't care if their environment is being destroyed if it isn't immediately effecting them...

Must be a state or community thing. One I'm around typically frowns on that behavior...course it's the 'natural' state, there's a lot of 'fucking nowhere' and 70% of the state voted Republican but hey!

____________________

Tina
Beep boop
Level: 79

Posts: 1176/1549
EXP: 4472104
For next: 107363

Since: 08-10-07

Since last post: 3.4 years
Last activity: 3.4 years

Posted on 04-03-09 12:26:04 PM

Link | Quote

Originally posted by emcee
slightly less effective

You mean, completely ineffective.

As I said, just shut up if you don't know what you're talking about.

____________________

emcee
Member
Level: 37

Posts: 81/267
EXP: 320001
For next: 18252

Since: 08-11-07

Since last post: 12.9 years
Last activity: 12.7 years

Posted on 04-03-09 12:39:15 PM

Link | Quote

Originally posted by Sakura
Must be a state or community thing. One I'm around typically frowns on that behavior...course it's the 'natural' state, there's a lot of 'fucking nowhere' and 70% of the state voted Republican but hey!

Point in case: When gas was cheap, most people were against offshore drilling, when gas got expensive most people supported it.

Originally posted by Tina

You mean, completely ineffective.

As I said, just shut up if you don't know what you're talking about.

"slightly less effective", "completely ineffective", I'm sure the truth is somewhere in between.

Even if it really doesn't work at all, dish soap and a sponge is still just as effective as always.

Tina
Beep boop
Level: 79

Posts: 1177/1549
EXP: 4472104
For next: 107363

Since: 08-10-07

Since last post: 3.4 years
Last activity: 3.4 years

Posted on 04-03-09 12:40:51 PM

Link | Quote

Washing dishes by hand is several times more inefficient than washing dishes in a dish washer.

____________________

Register - Login
Views: 99855928	Main - Memberlist - Active users - Calendar - Wiki - IRC Chat - Online users Ranks - Rules/FAQ - Stats - Latest Posts - Color Chart - Smilies	05-04-22 11:52:20 AM

Query execution time:	0.085887 seconds
Script execution time:	0.044754 seconds
Total render time:	0.130641 seconds