Register - Login
Views: 99805515
Main - Memberlist - Active users - Calendar - Wiki - IRC Chat - Online users
Ranks - Rules/FAQ - Stats - Latest Posts - Color Chart - Smilies
05-03-22 07:52:57 AM
Jul - Meta - Why don't URLs automatically become links when posted? New poll - New thread - New reply
Pages: 1 2Next newer thread | Next older thread
Darkdata
Ruins!? ♥
Level: 103


Posts: 878/2892
EXP: 11446090
For next: 25316

Since: 07-04-07


Since last post: 202 days
Last activity: 10 days

Posted on 03-07-09 04:04:30 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by CarCat
I'm sure if this were in the original coding, none of you would be complaining to remove it in favor of Mozilla's system. It's a feature request people! There will always be a turn around, or short cut, or alternative, or just another way of doing it. Posting alternatives in this thread will not change the fact that there isn't a feature in the board to do it, it simply masks the problem. Complaining that said requester is lazy to me is not justification for not attempting to make such a thing under the convenience of others!




It's a pointless feature.

Also, cases like this (http://url.com/page_(pokemanz)) would drive webmasters crazy as () are valid characters for a link. See wikipedia.

____________________
CarCat

Level: 51


Posts: 556/572
EXP: 997018
For next: 16920

Since: 10-17-07

From: LA

Since last post: 13.0 years
Last activity: 11.9 years

Posted on 03-07-09 04:12:10 AM (last edited by CarCat at 03-07-09 01:13 AM) Link | Quote
Originally posted by Darkdata

It's a pointless feature.



The point is for URLs automatically become links when posted, if you've read the thread lately.

Originally posted by Darkdata

Also, cases like this (http://url.com/page_(pokemanz)) would drive webmasters crazy as () are valid characters for a link. See wikipedia.



Good point, it's not going to be perfect, especially for these very special situations, and therefore it shouldn't be a feature. In fact, a lot of thing aren't, so just remove those as well.
Teconmoon
Catgirl
User 275
Level: 84


Posts: 1436/1772
EXP: 5452010
For next: 209942

Since: 09-17-07

From: Edmonds, WA

Since last post: 12.5 years
Last activity: 12.5 years

Posted on 03-07-09 04:44:03 AM Link | Quote
Come on... This feature is pointless. Just remember to type

[url]

before a link and

[/url]

at the end. It takes literally less than a second of your time.
Lyskar
12210
-The Chaos within trumps the Chaos without-
Level: 192


Posts: 2216/12211
EXP: 99321441
For next: 552130

Since: 07-03-07

From: 52-2-88-7

Since last post: 7.4 years
Last activity: 7.3 years

Posted on 03-07-09 07:23:05 AM Link | Quote

Time/Date

03-07-09 01:23:05am

Posts

2216

Days Here

612

Level

67
Metal_Man88
Local Moderator
It would take less effort combined for you, Carcat, to use the url tag in every post you make a link, than it took to make this topic and argue about it.

QED, if you had no time for it you wouldn't be here arguing how you have no time to type a handful of characters.

____________________
Original Layout © Tobias Kelmandia
BlackNemesis13
1150
I am ***** but it's hard to pronounce, so you can call me Geno after the doll.
Level: 70


Posts: 195/1155
EXP: 2883828
For next: 131983

Since: 07-23-07

From: Columbus, Ohio

Since last post: 10.6 years
Last activity: 10.6 years

Posted on 03-07-09 03:39:09 PM Link | Quote
Uh, Carcat, the whole argument as to whether or not the feature should be implemented aside, you should really look up logical fallacies. Your argument is full of them.

____________________
Bob-omb8194
Still Explodin'
Level: 80


Posts: 65/1654
EXP: 4670320
For next: 112649

Since: 02-19-09

From: NC, US

Since last post: 10.8 years
Last activity: 10.8 years

Posted on 03-07-09 03:53:51 PM (last edited by Bob-omb8194 at 03-07-09 02:10 PM) Link | Quote
How do you rename a link? For example, change the way it looks in a post.
Teconmoon
Catgirl
User 275
Level: 84


Posts: 1437/1772
EXP: 5452010
For next: 209942

Since: 09-17-07

From: Edmonds, WA

Since last post: 12.5 years
Last activity: 12.5 years

Posted on 03-07-09 04:30:37 PM Link | Quote
What? I can hardly understand that post. I think you mean make a word become a link. First you type

<a href="

Then you type the URL. Then you type

">Whatever word you want</a>



So for example,

<a href="http://jul.rustedlogic.net">That one awesome forum.</a>

Will give you this. That one awesome forum.
CarCat

Level: 51


Posts: 558/572
EXP: 997018
For next: 16920

Since: 10-17-07

From: LA

Since last post: 13.0 years
Last activity: 11.9 years

Posted on 03-07-09 04:45:50 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Myon Beyond
...makes the simple task of inserting a quick link in any post take longer than it normally does when I do it anywhere else on the internet.

Just saying. Close thread.





Lenophis

Level: 15


Posts: 20/34
EXP: 13924
For next: 2460

Since: 10-30-08


Since last post: 13.1 years
Last activity: 12.0 years

Posted on 03-07-09 06:45:43 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Myon Beyond
...makes the simple task of being lazy by not spending a quarter of a second to type a tag a pain in the ass because the rest of the internet loves my laziness.

Just saying. Close thread.

Fixed that for ya.

____________________


To see a list of all of the bugs we've fixed so far, check here. 100 bugs and counting!
Teconmoon
Catgirl
User 275
Level: 84


Posts: 1438/1772
EXP: 5452010
For next: 209942

Since: 09-17-07

From: Edmonds, WA

Since last post: 12.5 years
Last activity: 12.5 years

Posted on 03-07-09 11:52:48 PM Link | Quote
Why is this being discussed?
Tina
Beep boop
Level: 79


Posts: 681/1549
EXP: 4471620
For next: 107847

Since: 08-10-07


Since last post: 3.4 years
Last activity: 3.4 years

Posted on 03-12-09 07:07:08 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by CarCat
I'm sure if this were in the original coding, none of you would be complaining to remove it in favor of Mozilla's system. It's a feature request people! There will always be a turn around, or short cut, or alternative, or just another way of doing it. Posting alternatives in this thread will not change the fact that there isn't a feature in the board to do it, it simply masks the problem. Complaining that said requester is lazy to me is not justification for not attempting to make such a thing under the convenience of others!

...

what

____________________
Darkdata
Ruins!? ♥
Level: 103


Posts: 887/2892
EXP: 11446090
For next: 25316

Since: 07-04-07


Since last post: 202 days
Last activity: 10 days

Posted on 03-12-09 10:01:13 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Tina
Originally posted by CarCat
I'm sure if this were in the original coding, none of you would be complaining to remove it in favor of Mozilla's system. It's a feature request people! There will always be a turn around, or short cut, or alternative, or just another way of doing it. Posting alternatives in this thread will not change the fact that there isn't a feature in the board to do it, it simply masks the problem. Complaining that said requester is lazy to me is not justification for not attempting to make such a thing under the convenience of others!

...

what


He misunderstood the question, confused the mentioning of an opera function for a firefox extention. Then goes on to call us lazy for not doing the request.

____________________
CarCat

Level: 51


Posts: 561/572
EXP: 997018
For next: 16920

Since: 10-17-07

From: LA

Since last post: 13.0 years
Last activity: 11.9 years

Posted on 03-13-09 01:53:20 AM (last edited by CarCat at 03-12-09 10:56 PM) Link | Quote
Originally posted by Darkdata
Originally posted by Tina
Originally posted by CarCat
I'm sure if this were in the original coding, none of you would be complaining to remove it in favor of Mozilla's system. It's a feature request people! There will always be a turn around, or short cut, or alternative, or just another way of doing it. Posting alternatives in this thread will not change the fact that there isn't a feature in the board to do it, it simply masks the problem. Complaining that said requester is lazy to me is not justification for not attempting to make such a thing under the convenience of others!

...

what


He misunderstood the question, confused the mentioning of an opera function for a firefox extention. Then goes on to call us lazy for not doing the request.


I understood the question. I never called you all lazy...it's the other way around. Whether I confused an opera extension with a firefox extension is beside the point.

The point I wanted to get across was:

*If this were in the original coding, none of you would be complaining to remove it.
*No matter which way you look at it, there will always be an alternate method of doing said feature's job.
**Case: Why have BBCode when you can use the better HTML.

...and to add to that:

*Lets say someone didn't add the [url]'s to their post, if someone is on a mobile device looking at the site, most are probably basically screwed because they can't copy and paste the URL.

Lyskar
12210
-The Chaos within trumps the Chaos without-
Level: 192


Posts: 2242/12211
EXP: 99321441
For next: 552130

Since: 07-03-07

From: 52-2-88-7

Since last post: 7.4 years
Last activity: 7.3 years

Posted on 03-14-09 05:13:27 AM Link | Quote

Time/Date

03-13-09 11:13:27pm

Posts

2242

Days Here

619

Level

68
Metal_Man88
Local Moderator
Because of course, Jul is a mainstream website which is all about universal browser compatibility, mobile users, competing with other board systems, and based around user feature requests.

Excuse me, I must use my flying car to go to my new job in the stock market right now.

____________________
Original Layout © Tobias Kelmandia
Teconmoon
Catgirl
User 275
Level: 84


Posts: 1473/1772
EXP: 5452010
For next: 209942

Since: 09-17-07

From: Edmonds, WA

Since last post: 12.5 years
Last activity: 12.5 years

Posted on 03-14-09 08:22:03 PM Link | Quote
Pages: 1 2Next newer thread | Next older thread
Jul - Meta - Why don't URLs automatically become links when posted? New poll - New thread - New reply


Rusted Logic

Acmlmboard - commit 47be4dc [2021-08-23]
©2000-2022 Acmlm, Xkeeper, Kaito Sinclaire, et al.

29 database queries, 5 query cache hits.
Query execution time: 0.089961 seconds
Script execution time: 0.035144 seconds
Total render time: 0.125105 seconds