Register - Login
Views: 99831270
Main - Memberlist - Active users - Calendar - Wiki - IRC Chat - Online users
Ranks - Rules/FAQ - Stats - Latest Posts - Color Chart - Smilies
05-03-22 09:23:57 PM
Jul - Computers and Technology - CSS Anti-table elitism? New poll - New thread - New reply
Pages: 1 2Next newer thread | Next older thread
Xkeeper

Level: 263


Posts: 9653/25353
EXP: 297157423
For next: 1803030

Since: 07-03-07

Pronouns: they/them/????????

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 14 hours

Posted on 02-12-09 05:32:23 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Darkdata
Originally posted by Xkeeper
better hope you don't want anything at the bottom of the page!)


What do you mean by the bottom of the page? I can see a nice white bottom with the border on top showing links.
Pic here

On a side note, I found it useful...

Sadly I can't link to my site due to hosting issues again...

Small Edit: I count only 8 Divs, not 12.

I mean this.

bottom!
Tiden
Disgusting human being, just awful
Level: NaN


Posts: 3354/-6493
EXP: NaN
For next: 0

Since: 07-03-07

Pronouns: they/them

Since last post: 4.1 years
Last activity: 3.6 years

Posted on 02-12-09 05:35:37 AM (last edited by hydraphatphelinez at 02-12-09 02:39 AM) Link | Quote
okay.

Bottom!


Divs.

Edit: changed a div into a span.
Rachel Mae

Creature of Chaos
Level: 141


Posts: 1706/5929
EXP: 33605803
For next: 514211

Since: 07-03-07

Pronouns: she/her
From: Foxglen

Since last post: 21 days
Last activity: 14 hours

Posted on 02-12-09 09:21:09 AM Link | Quote
Jul Mosts 2009
Originally posted by hydraphatphelinez
Actuallllly, a few rendering engines support "non-standard" css declarations:



-moz-border-radius


and



-webkit-border-radius



There's supposed to be an equivalent, standard declaration specified in CSS3, but only supported in FF3 and any webkit-based browser (surprise!)
Death to proprietary HTML! Long live proprietary CSS!

The hypocrisy burns.

____________________
Sukasa

Level: 123


Posts: 662/4326
EXP: 20936862
For next: 294404

Since: 07-07-07


Since last post: 1.1 years
Last activity: 1.1 years

Posted on 02-12-09 01:45:09 PM Link | Quote
I find divs useful in some places (oddly, I find them easier to position), but apart from that, trying to do *any* sort of complex positioning just screws right up if I don't use tables.

____________________

[18:18:26] <&SuBot> Ask Tina
Darkdata
Ruins!? ♥
Level: 103


Posts: 842/2892
EXP: 11446685
For next: 24721

Since: 07-04-07


Since last post: 203 days
Last activity: 11 days

Posted on 02-12-09 02:33:15 PM (last edited by Darkdata at 02-12-09 11:37 AM) Link | Quote
Originally posted by Metal_Man88
Feh, you want outdated but useful tags?

Well, first thing, Bold strike underline italics. Wait a minute, that is that? They have 'Strong' instead? Really now. HTML came from SGML back a long time ago. You're not gonna make it less dependent on tags which say 'display THIS way' than it already is with CSS


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"
>

Hehe, Maybe I am not that great of a supporter after all. Huzzah for Transitional for letting me <b> <I> and <u> to my hearts content.

Originally posted by Waffle Ryebread
Originally posted by hydraphatphelinez
Actuallllly, a few rendering engines support "non-standard" css declarations:



-moz-border-radius


and



-webkit-border-radius



There's supposed to be an equivalent, standard declaration specified in CSS3, but only supported in FF3 and any webkit-based browser (surprise!)
Death to proprietary HTML! Long live proprietary CSS!

The hypocrisy burns.


Then why just not use it, and do it the million of other methods? The nice thing about web design is that as long as it works and looks nice, any extra details are just window dressing. [even web validation, look at google ]

____________________
Rachel Mae

Creature of Chaos
Level: 141


Posts: 1716/5929
EXP: 33605803
For next: 514211

Since: 07-03-07

Pronouns: she/her
From: Foxglen

Since last post: 21 days
Last activity: 14 hours

Posted on 02-13-09 03:47:27 AM Link | Quote
Jul Mosts 2009
Originally posted by Darkdata
Then why just not use it, and do it the million of other methods? The nice thing about web design is that as long as it works and looks nice, any extra details are just window dressing. [even web validation, look at google ]
Uh, I don't use them. I'm just saying it's rather hypocritical for an organization that prides itself on having a standards-compliant browser to include non-standard CSS declarations.

____________________
Lyskar
12210
-The Chaos within trumps the Chaos without-
Level: 192


Posts: 2019/12211
EXP: 99326603
For next: 546968

Since: 07-03-07

From: 52-2-88-7

Since last post: 7.4 years
Last activity: 7.3 years

Posted on 02-13-09 04:24:59 AM Link | Quote

Time/Date

02-12-09 10:24:59pm

Posts

2019

Days Here

590

Level

64
Metal_Man88
Local Moderator
'Sides, we all know the Web doesn't use the standards, even the good ones. It uses what it wants, and browsers support 'em.

____________________
Original Layout © Tobias Kelmandia
Xkeeper

Level: 263


Posts: 9710/25353
EXP: 297157423
For next: 1803030

Since: 07-03-07

Pronouns: they/them/????????

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 14 hours

Posted on 02-13-09 10:38:58 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Darkdata
The nice thing about web design is that as long as it works and looks nice, any extra details are just window dressing. [even web validation, look at google ]

honestly, this.

the whole concept of 'Valid XHTML 1.01 Strict' is fucking stupid. Who cares? (also, lol @ every error is fatal.)

Being able to get a "Valid HTML" button does not make your site any better than without. 99.999% of the web population doesn't fucking care. It's great and all if it works, but it provides nothing better functionally*.

By the way, here's another piece of table positioning you'd be hard-pressed to replicate:



Oh, what's that? divs don't support "vertical-align"? oh well!

(yes, there is "display: table"... But what about col/rowspan? IE6/7? tables work in pretty fucking much everything.)


* in before "durr, but there are people out there using Lynx and/or are disabled": right. having super valid HTML (instead of just well-formed, like using headings and paragraphs) really makes a fucking difference.
Tiden
Disgusting human being, just awful
Level: NaN


Posts: 3359/-6493
EXP: NaN
For next: 0

Since: 07-03-07

Pronouns: they/them

Since last post: 4.1 years
Last activity: 3.6 years

Posted on 02-13-09 07:16:07 PM (last edited by hydraphatphelinez at 02-13-09 04:19 PM) Link | Quote


cheated with padding >:|
Pages: 1 2Next newer thread | Next older thread
Jul - Computers and Technology - CSS Anti-table elitism? New poll - New thread - New reply


Rusted Logic

Acmlmboard - commit 47be4dc [2021-08-23]
©2000-2022 Acmlm, Xkeeper, Kaito Sinclaire, et al.

29 database queries, 1 query cache hits.
Query execution time: 0.083249 seconds
Script execution time: 0.029102 seconds
Total render time: 0.112351 seconds