| Xkeeper Level: 263 ![]() Posts: 23358/25343 EXP: 296699877 For next: 2260576 Since: 07-03-07 Pronouns: they/them/???????? Since last post: 8 days Last activity: 2 days |
|
||
Originally posted by Tarale I don't know if there is an answer. I don't think there is. In fact, thinking about it, you end up with the same kind of situation anywhere you can do this sort of thing. Consider e-mail, for example; it's much, much easier to hit Fwd: on that email instead of taking ten seconds to see if it's legitimate, and you can blast it out to everyone on your contact list with a few buttons. (My grandfather actually does this pretty often, enough so that I have a filter that automatically dumps anything with the forward marker in the subject line directly into the trash.) Snopes came up as a way to refute that sort of thing, and it's been all but completely useless. Even when someone does go look it up, that's... one person who's learned the truth now, out of how many? One forward from a typical conspiracy sharer reaches tens, if not hundreds, of people, and due to the way human brains work, even if they take the time to send the facts back, most people won't admit they're wrong. Social media and microblogging have sort of distilled that into an essence; write a post, goes viral, gets shared to thousands (or millions) of eyes, then is copied, pasted, screenshotted, cross-posted, etc. until it's difficult to have not seen it. And if someone takes the time to show how the original post is full of crap? Well, nobody's going to share that, and it's not like deleting it makes other people forget. At least with older forms, where there was a sort of. Central place? There could be an Correction: this article incorrectly said (thing); we have updated it to correctly say (thing) note at the top, noting the error and correcting it. You don't get that here. Not to mention that virality rewards the most breath-taking, unbelievable clickbaity garbage possible... ____________________ (Lv 244 with 228214048 EXP) |















)



