Register - Login
Views: 94195625
Main - Memberlist - Active users - Calendar - Wiki - IRC Chat - Online users
Ranks - Rules/FAQ - Stats - Latest Posts - Color Chart - Smilies
08-14-18 06:12:26 PM

Jul - Display Case - Mafia V: Round 10 New poll - New thread - Thread closed
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5Next newer thread | Next older thread
Q
Seeker of the tru7h
Level: 99


Posts: 2358/2878
EXP: 9801175
For next: 198825

Since: 08-02-07

Pronouns: she/her
From: Nowhere

Since last post: 23 hours
Last activity: 9 hours

Posted on 02-02-12 10:26:23 PM Link
legacyme3, not only are you playing suspiciously for reasons already pointed out, but your defensive argument seems almost intentionally weak as well.

It seems to me that you want to be killed off. If you turn out to be a Mafia member or a Thug, then I would be very suspicious of some the people who have been pressing for your death up to this point.

If not, then we should at least send the message that people shouldn't make such accusations at the drop of a hat. We have to be skeptical of every accusation made, so it's best if we don't spend our time second guessing everyone each and every time somebody makes one on a whim.
Ramon
Member
Level: 36


Posts: 253/294
EXP: 306927
For next: 1183

Since: 06-20-08


Since last post: 2.0 years
Last activity: 6 hours

Posted on 02-03-12 07:46:03 AM Link
No-kill it is from me.
Girlydragon
2940
Possibly neither Girly nor Dragon.
Level: 100


Posts: 2367/2941
EXP: 10140596
For next: 213800

Since: 07-21-07

From: Sweden

Since last post: 159 days
Last activity: 43 sec.

Posted on 02-03-12 10:26:20 AM Link
Wait, let me see if I got this right.

You guys are voting for legacy because he's "dangerous"? Because he's willing to throw around a few accusations?

So... Instead of being active and moving, we should... Be too scared to even make accusations? Deeming those who dare do stuff "dangerous" and instantly flattened.



Now that.

THAT.

Is a Mafia tactic.


So, if being dangerous is that bad, then I think that YOU The Red Snifit is far more dangerous by doing what could only be deemed as preaching silence.
Snowdeath
560
Deaf bat walking on water.
Level: 46


Posts: 316/567
EXP: 688902
For next: 22872

Since: 06-29-11

From: Port Alberni, BC

Since last post: 4.0 years
Last activity: 2.0 years

Posted on 02-03-12 02:27:56 PM Link
Originally posted by Girlydragon
So, if being dangerous is that bad, then I think that YOU The Red Snifit is far more dangerous by doing what could only be deemed as preaching silence.


Totally off-topic here, but I thought you could only vote for those on the list, and nobody else?
Sukasa

Dances with Ponies
Level: 117


Posts: 3718/4280
EXP: 17833824
For next: 14071

Since: 07-07-07


Since last post: 3.0 years
Last activity: 3.0 years

Posted on 02-03-12 02:30:22 PM Link
That one is my fault. Usually it's 3 choices + nokill, but instead of writing "*Unassigned*" I left it out. As such, I'll let the vote for TRS pass, because it should have been made more clear that a third vote was allowed.
legacyme3
"In short, legacyme3 does horrible things to people, and I don't think anyone else on Jul should be exposed to him, no matter how decent of a person he pretends to be."

I don't normally ban for offsite behavior but you're a whole level of terrible.
Level: NaN


Posts: 1249/-1694
EXP: NaN
For next: 0

Since: 06-01-11


Since last post: 5.0 years
Last activity: 15 days

Posted on 02-03-12 07:54:10 PM Link
Originally posted by The Red Snifit

It seems to me that you want to be killed off. If you turn out to be a Mafia member or a Thug, then I would be very suspicious of some the people who have been pressing for your death up to this point.



I think this is showing some of your mafia rust... no worries though.

I think it's ridiculous I have so many votes for making an accusation based on something I read, and made a quick decision about.
Nksor

Buster Beetle
Level: 43


Posts: 387/472
EXP: 529549
For next: 35497

Since: 04-26-11

From: The Void

Since last post: 1.0 years
Last activity: 1.0 years

Posted on 02-03-12 08:27:08 PM (last edited by BlueWhirl at 02-03-12 08:27 PM) Link
Originally posted by legacyme3
I think it's ridiculous I have so many votes for making an accusation based on something I read


There's a difference between an accusation and willy nilly changing sides.

Originally posted by legacyme3
and made a quick decision about.


Mafia =/= Quick. We need tactical people, not people who would rather play russian roulette than a game of logic.
Q
Seeker of the tru7h
Level: 99


Posts: 2359/2878
EXP: 9801175
For next: 198825

Since: 08-02-07

Pronouns: she/her
From: Nowhere

Since last post: 23 hours
Last activity: 9 hours

Posted on 02-03-12 08:31:16 PM Link
Originally posted by Girlydragon
So, if being dangerous is that bad, then I think that YOU The Red Snifit is far more dangerous by doing what could only be deemed as preaching silence.
I am not preaching silence. I am preaching reason.

If our players can't be bothered to come up with a good reason for their accusations while everybody jumps on them anyway, then we are in a situation where chaos is supreme and manipulation by the Mafia is inevitable.

Action is good, but if we don't take this seriously, we'll all be played for fools.
Nksor

Buster Beetle
Level: 43


Posts: 388/472
EXP: 529549
For next: 35497

Since: 04-26-11

From: The Void

Since last post: 1.0 years
Last activity: 1.0 years

Posted on 02-03-12 08:50:19 PM Link
Originally posted by Girlydragon
You guys are voting for legacy because he's "dangerous"? Because he's willing to throw around a few accusations?


I think you're completely missing the point here, bro.

I'm barely holding his original "joke" accusation on him. No, no, I'm wondering about the questionably quick decisions, along with his weak defensive arguments.

If we were ousting for being "dangerous", you'd be the one being accused. You've made the most edgy accusations, along with throwing back that Red's plead for everyone to "slow down" is "a Mafia tactic". You've made some of the weakest arguments so far, but I haven't said anything about it because I'm willing to listen to those who speak, as long as they think first.

As a rebuttal, I question why you're defending legacyme3 so strongly and counter-accusing the people who are trying to get an answer out of him. I also question why you stepped over my huge post about timestamps and instead insisted that we're killing him because he's "dangerous" and we obviously have no reasons other than that. It's just a question, though, so you don't have to answer - although I'd definitely recommend it

That's all for now.
Girlydragon
2940
Possibly neither Girly nor Dragon.
Level: 100


Posts: 2368/2941
EXP: 10140596
For next: 213800

Since: 07-21-07

From: Sweden

Since last post: 159 days
Last activity: 43 sec.

Posted on 02-04-12 07:30:48 AM (last edited by Girlydragon at 02-04-12 07:31 AM) Link
Originally posted by The Red Snifit
I am not preaching silence. I am preaching reason.

If our players can't be bothered to come up with a good reason for their accusations while everybody jumps on them anyway, then we are in a situation where chaos is supreme and manipulation by the Mafia is inevitable.

Action is good, but if we don't take this seriously, we'll all be played for fools.



I can only guess that we draw the line for what is reason differently then. I think that so far most accusations is definitely withing reason, maybe aside from the one silverthundr made with actually nothing to say about it, but he backed it up with some stuff later on.


Originally posted by BlueWhirl
If we were ousting for being "dangerous", you'd be the one being accused. You've made the most edgy accusations, along with throwing back that Red's plead for everyone to "slow down" is "a Mafia tactic". You've made some of the weakest arguments so far, but I haven't said anything about it because I'm willing to listen to those who speak, as long as they think first.


I can safely tell you, and will stand by my choice to say that trying to hold back on the flow of information in this game is a very good Mafia tactic, if it's succeeds that is. Even if TRS meant well with his accusation the risk is high that the aura of the game would become that of Accusing = Death. And we wouldn't like that.

Originally posted by BlueWhirl
As a rebuttal, I question why you're defending legacyme3 so strongly and counter-accusing the people who are trying to get an answer out of him. I also question why you stepped over my huge post about timestamps and instead insisted that we're killing him because he's "dangerous" and we obviously have no reasons other than that. It's just a question, though, so you don't have to answer - although I'd definitely recommend it




I stepped over it because I found it just plain meh.

You say he had 30 seconds, think about it.

11:35:23 was my post. His edit was made sometime in the time frame of 11:36.

That could possibly mean 11:36:59.

That'd be 1 minute and 36 seconds to make the edit, triple that of your logic. Even assuming that he'd be in the middle of the minute at 11:36:30, that would still be 1 minute and 7 seconds to go.

YOU based your fussy logic based on him making editing his post right at the start of the minute.


Trust me, 1 minute 36 seconds is plenty of time to consider developments and make such a small edit.



Edit: I must of course admit that I am not completely unbiased in this as his accusation was a mirror on my own, but hey, no one is perfect.
Sukasa

Dances with Ponies
Level: 117


Posts: 3721/4280
EXP: 17833824
For next: 14071

Since: 07-07-07


Since last post: 3.0 years
Last activity: 3.0 years

Posted on 02-04-12 11:02:05 AM (last edited by Sukasa at 02-04-12 03:13 PM) Link
I think we've managed to come to a majority.

Nobody died today. Instead, we'll advance to the night round.

List O' Players: (Mafia to Bystanders - 3:9)
1. Ramon
2. Sanky
3. legacyme3
4. Nicole
5. The Red Snifit
6. MM200
7. krutomisi
8. BlueWhirl
9. silverthundr
10. Girlydragon
11. Snowdeath
12. CJMiller

List O' Positions:
Bystanders (4)
The Mafia Members (2)
The Doctor
The Sheriff
The Thug
The Trapper
The Godfather
The Insomniac
Sunny

Level: 110


Posts: 3468/3675
EXP: 14160553
For next: 248333

Since: 07-23-07


Since last post: 180 days
Last activity: 19 days

Posted on 02-12-12 02:19:04 AM Link
"Posted on 02-04-12 10:02:05 AM"
"02-12-12 01:18:26 AM"

Is it a PARTY YET
Snowdeath
560
Deaf bat walking on water.
Level: 46


Posts: 379/567
EXP: 688902
For next: 22872

Since: 06-29-11

From: Port Alberni, BC

Since last post: 4.0 years
Last activity: 2.0 years

Posted on 02-12-12 02:22:35 AM Link
Originally posted by MM200
"Posted on 02-04-12 10:02:05 AM"
"02-12-12 01:18:26 AM"

Is it a PARTY YET


I wish
Sukasa

Dances with Ponies
Level: 117


Posts: 3726/4280
EXP: 17833824
For next: 14071

Since: 07-07-07


Since last post: 3.0 years
Last activity: 3.0 years

Posted on 02-13-12 07:02:23 PM Link
...

MM200 can probably guess what kept me. I am very sorry.



You all wake up... and really, you still have no idea what's going on. Nobody died.

List O' Players: (Mafia to Bystanders - 3:9)
1. Ramon
2. Sanky
3. legacyme3
4. Nicole
5. The Red Snifit
6. MM200
7. krutomisi
8. BlueWhirl
9. silverthundr
10. Girlydragon
11. Snowdeath
12. CJMiller

List O' Positions:
Bystanders (4)
The Mafia Members (2)
The Doctor
The Sheriff
The Thug
The Trapper
The Godfather
The Insomniac

What now?
legacyme3
"In short, legacyme3 does horrible things to people, and I don't think anyone else on Jul should be exposed to him, no matter how decent of a person he pretends to be."

I don't normally ban for offsite behavior but you're a whole level of terrible.
Level: NaN


Posts: 1264/-1694
EXP: NaN
For next: 0

Since: 06-01-11


Since last post: 5.0 years
Last activity: 15 days

Posted on 02-13-12 09:59:08 PM (last edited by legacyme3 at 02-17-12 10:14 PM) Link
So it's pretty evident the mafia is looking for the thug. :|

*legacyme3 is being very obvious.

This is by no means a condemnation of them, but I think The Red Snifit, and BlueWhirl are suspicious persons. I have others on my mind but you two jump out the most. And it's not even because you both voted me.

Actually, for me, it seems you two are working in collusion with one another. I know for a fact something is up between you two and it is not good for the bystanders.

I admit to playing dangerously, but as we can see now, the mafia is going to play hide and seek until they find the thug. I want to hit them before they hit us. There are only 8 real bystanders since I put the thug in with mafia. That gives us a 2:1 ratio of B:M.

If the mafia finds the thug before we find a mafia member, then it'll be extremely difficult to climb out of that hole. I think we should focus on you two because in my honest opinion you are both extremely suspicious characters.
Ramon
Member
Level: 36


Posts: 257/294
EXP: 306927
For next: 1183

Since: 06-20-08


Since last post: 2.0 years
Last activity: 6 hours

Posted on 02-14-12 10:12:17 AM Link
I'm going to go ahead and nominate CJ Miller and Sanky, because the last thing we need are inactive people when it comes down to a three-man showdown in the final round.

They haven't really said anything or much last day, so I kind of suspect they could be trying to stay under the radar...
Sunny

Level: 110


Posts: 3470/3675
EXP: 14160553
For next: 248333

Since: 07-23-07


Since last post: 180 days
Last activity: 19 days

Posted on 02-14-12 11:32:53 AM Link
CJM was inactive last round, yes. There is no need to involve an extra weight that cannot attend the party when it starts.
Sanky, not so much. One post during the accusation phase > no post at all. He'll be around.
TRS and BlueWhirl, I will refrain from voting towards until further evidence does thus get presented.
Originally posted by The Red Snifit
If our players can't be bothered to come up with a good reason for their accusations while everybody jumps on them anyway, then we are in a situation where chaos is supreme and manipulation by the Mafia is inevitable.
Or we could be in a situation where the Mafia tells the sheep (bystanders) to calm the fuck down while they take role.

Just sayin'.
Girlydragon
2940
Possibly neither Girly nor Dragon.
Level: 100


Posts: 2382/2941
EXP: 10140596
For next: 213800

Since: 07-21-07

From: Sweden

Since last post: 159 days
Last activity: 43 sec.

Posted on 02-16-12 02:46:24 PM (last edited by Girlydragon at 02-16-12 03:47 PM) Link
One vote for CJ Miller if he's not gonna play at all then just off him, seems reasonable to me.

I'm not really sure I have faaaaar to much more to say at the moment? Gonna see how the accusations so far pan out.

Oh and...

Also Snowdeath.
Sanqui
1730
🦉
Level: 77


Posts: 1111/1733
EXP: 4055151
For next: 135978

Since: 12-20-09

Pronouns: any
From: Czechia (NEW!)

Since last post: 9 days
Last activity: 13 hours

Posted on 02-16-12 03:38:02 PM (last edited by Sanky at 02-16-12 03:49 PM) Link
I didn't really say anything for the rest of the first round because I though we should wait for the next round before voting somebody off, and in the end, it came to a no-kill anyway. Seems like the mafia has opted for the same strategy as Round 8, though.
I hate to bandwagon, but CJMiller really should reply. It worked to me, at least. Not voting for him in the final voting if he replies.
TRS and, by extension, BlueWhirl raise valid points.. However, due to what she had told me last round, I'm not sure if I'm going to trust Snowdeath. While it obviously was a joke, its purpose might have been to make us think she's not the Godfather.
I'm going to throw a weak Snowdeath here, but I'll change it if something more reliable comes up.

Never mind, I just found the log. Nothing was implied; turns out I completely misinterpreted the conversation. Don't mind me.
Still suspicious a bit, though.
Q
Seeker of the tru7h
Level: 99


Posts: 2368/2878
EXP: 9801175
For next: 198825

Since: 08-02-07

Pronouns: she/her
From: Nowhere

Since last post: 23 hours
Last activity: 9 hours

Posted on 02-17-12 09:14:38 PM Link
Originally posted by legacyme3
Actually, for me, it seems you two are working in collusion with one another. I know for a fact something is up between you two and it is not good for the bystanders.

I find it very suspicious that you're making false claims while acting so sure that they're true, especially when you don't bother to present any evidence to support them.

I can only guess what your intentions are, but once again, you seem like you want to be accused, so I'll set this aside this time.


It seems that the main focus now is CJMiller, but it looks pretty clear that he doesn't intend to participate in this round. He probably doesn't have a special role, and if he does, this playing style, or lack thereof, is going to get him killed before the round ends anyway.

Instead of killing him off now and giving the Mafia another free round to investigate, let's try and find somebody who could actually be a threat to us first.


Sanky, in particular, has exhibited some pretty typical Mafia behavior. First, he tries to slip under the radar by posting as few times as he can get away with. Then, he jumps the moment somebody mentions his name and then makes a bandwagon vote, trying to look as "normal" as possible.

Sanky looks like he has something to hide, while CJMiller looks like he doesn't. Between the two, I think it should be pretty clear who we should be voting off.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5Next newer thread | Next older thread
Jul - Display Case - Mafia V: Round 10 New poll - New thread - Thread closed




Rusted Logic

Acmlmboard - commit 5d36857 [2018-03-03]
©2000-2018 Acmlm, Xkeeper, Inuyasha, et al.

29 database queries, 5 query cache hits.
Query execution time: 0.175223 seconds
Script execution time: 0.032780 seconds
Total render time: 0.208003 seconds
Memory used: 1310720