Sukasa![]() Level: 123 Posts: 3425/4326 EXP: 20918525 For next: 312741 Since: 07-07-07 Since last post: 1.1 years Last activity: 1.0 years |
|
||||||||
|
![]() Register - Login |
||
| Main - Memberlist - Active users - Calendar - Wiki - IRC Chat - Online users Ranks - Rules/FAQ - Stats - Latest Posts - Color Chart - Smilies |
||
| Jul - Display Case - Clue(do) | - - ![]() |
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 | Next newer thread | Next older thread |
Sukasa![]() Level: 123 Posts: 3425/4326 EXP: 20918525 For next: 312741 Since: 07-07-07 Since last post: 1.1 years Last activity: 1.0 years |
|
||||||||
|
Nicole![]() Disk-kun Level: 146 ![]() Posts: 5221/6469 EXP: 38253357 For next: 259937 Since: 07-07-07 Pronouns: she/her From: Boston, MA Since last post: 69 days Last activity: 1 day |
|
||
|
I was trying to make my way over to the Story Forum... oh well.
![]() I'll sign up for Round 2 as well, it was fun. ![]() ____________________ |
| Ramon Member Level: 38 Posts: 190/294 EXP: 358432 For next: 12015 Since: 06-20-08 Since last post: 5.9 years Last activity: 2.0 years |
|
||
| In fact I'll be using another story/setting/board/data packets each game to prevent monotony. About the simultaneous gameplay stuff, I've thought of these changes: 1) In each round, instead of having every player go turn by turn, everybody rolls his dice (visible in the post). Then everybody sends me a PM with their actions (move where + suggestion). After everybody has PMed me their actions, all the actions are publicly revealed, then the next round starts. 2) When a player makes a suggestion, the respective player is NOT moved into that section. That way you can plan your route through the rooms better. 3) (optional rule enforcement) A player can roll an additional die once in a game. 4) Gadgets...? (Stuff like +1 Die Roll, 1x Teleport, 1x Suggestion Anywhere, 1x View Opponent's Data Packet). Could make it more interesting, though also more unbalanced. The only problem I'm facing with this method would be the accusation. If multiple people accuse in the same round, who would win? It'd be possible that a player makes a suggestion with the answer just to be sure that really nobody has those data packets, and then everybody could just make that accusation. Perhaps again - a PM in the previous round, stating you want to accuse after your suggestion? |
Sukasa![]() Level: 123 Posts: 3426/4326 EXP: 20918525 For next: 312741 Since: 07-07-07 Since last post: 1.1 years Last activity: 1.0 years |
|
||||||||
|
Lunaria![]() Moon Bunny! :3 Level: 139 Posts: 4119/5751 EXP: 32000672 For next: 466773 Since: 07-28-07 Pronouns: she/her From: pile of fluff Since last post: 68 days Last activity: 1 day |
|
||
|
| legacyme3 "In short, legacyme3 does horrible things to people, and I don't think anyone else on Jul should be exposed to him, no matter how decent of a person he pretends to be." I don't normally ban for offsite behavior but you're a whole level of terrible. Level: NaN ![]() Posts: 725/-1694 EXP: NaN For next: 0 Since: 06-01-11 Since last post: 8.9 years Last activity: 3.7 years |
|
||
|
| Ramon Member Level: 38 Posts: 191/294 EXP: 358432 For next: 12015 Since: 06-20-08 Since last post: 5.9 years Last activity: 2.0 years |
|
||
| ^Karis: Yeah, that's why I tried not to include any sort of "First come, first get" thing anywhere. I'd know a better solution: There's a room in the center of the board (similar to the Display Case we had), and to make an accusation, you need to be in that room. Basically, in your turn, instead of suggesting, you go into that room and make an accusation. That would eliminate the possibility with the "everybody accuse at once" thing, because nobody knows where you're headed for your round, or when you're headed for that room. Also, any objections against using a fourth kind of card - that is, if the number of players increases beyond 6? |
Sukasa![]() Level: 123 Posts: 3428/4326 EXP: 20918525 For next: 312741 Since: 07-07-07 Since last post: 1.1 years Last activity: 1.0 years |
|
||||||||
|
| Ramon Member Level: 38 Posts: 192/294 EXP: 358432 For next: 12015 Since: 06-20-08 Since last post: 5.9 years Last activity: 2.0 years |
|
||
| I thought of something like motive or the likes. But, once again, no idea inhowfar it would interfere with the game's balance. |
| Ramon Member Level: 38 Posts: 197/294 EXP: 358432 For next: 12015 Since: 06-20-08 Since last post: 5.9 years Last activity: 2.0 years |
|
||
| I just wanted to inform you guys I'll be on vacations and thus almost unreachable for 2 weeks, starting tomorrow. Sign-ups will be open until then, I'll also glady take on any suggestions you may have. |
| silverthundr 160 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Level: 29 Posts: 57/166 EXP: 133841 For next: 14044 Since: 08-04-11 From: Oregon Since last post: 9.2 years Last activity: 8.8 years |
|
||
|
So I guess I'll sign up first, then.
And have fun. ____________________ |
Lunaria![]() Moon Bunny! :3 Level: 139 Posts: 4131/5751 EXP: 32000672 For next: 466773 Since: 07-28-07 Pronouns: she/her From: pile of fluff Since last post: 68 days Last activity: 1 day |
|
||
|
Sukasa![]() Level: 123 Posts: 3443/4326 EXP: 20918525 For next: 312741 Since: 07-07-07 Since last post: 1.1 years Last activity: 1.0 years |
|
||||||||
|
Nicole![]() Disk-kun Level: 146 ![]() Posts: 5248/6469 EXP: 38253357 For next: 259937 Since: 07-07-07 Pronouns: she/her From: Boston, MA Since last post: 69 days Last activity: 1 day |
|
||
|
I guess we're re-signing up now?
Alright then, I'm in for the next round too.____________________ |
| legacyme3 "In short, legacyme3 does horrible things to people, and I don't think anyone else on Jul should be exposed to him, no matter how decent of a person he pretends to be." I don't normally ban for offsite behavior but you're a whole level of terrible. Level: NaN ![]() Posts: 744/-1694 EXP: NaN For next: 0 Since: 06-01-11 Since last post: 8.9 years Last activity: 3.7 years |
|
||
|
Sukasa![]() Level: 123 Posts: 3444/4326 EXP: 20918525 For next: 312741 Since: 07-07-07 Since last post: 1.1 years Last activity: 1.0 years |
|
||||||||
|
Nicole![]() Disk-kun Level: 146 ![]() Posts: 5249/6469 EXP: 38253357 For next: 259937 Since: 07-07-07 Pronouns: she/her From: Boston, MA Since last post: 69 days Last activity: 1 day |
|
||
Originally posted by Sukasa Or if we can't (since a large number could make things too complicated), maybe we could just allow anyone to sign up until the game starts, and then have Ramon randomly choose six? ____________________ |
Sukasa![]() Level: 123 Posts: 3445/4326 EXP: 20918525 For next: 312741 Since: 07-07-07 Since last post: 1.1 years Last activity: 1.0 years |
|
||||||||
|
| Ramon Member Level: 38 Posts: 199/294 EXP: 358432 For next: 12015 Since: 06-20-08 Since last post: 5.9 years Last activity: 2.0 years |
|
||
| Okay, I know I said I wouldn't be reachable, but it seems the tables have turned and now I just wanted to specify on singing up. If I introduce the simultaneous gameplay thingy, pretty much any number of players can join. With the classic turn-based system, it would take a little too long with over 6 players. Personally, I think I'd prefer the simultaneous gameplay version. Gotta try it first, though. Of course, with increasing amount of players the amount of data packets will increase as well (hence I suggested introducing a fourth set). Going to plan it out once I know how many people join (though it doesn't look like anybody else is interested). |
| Ramon Member Level: 38 Posts: 201/294 EXP: 358432 For next: 12015 Since: 06-20-08 Since last post: 5.9 years Last activity: 2.0 years |
|
||
| I'm back, and I guess I'll be making the next board soon. So as far as I can tell, 5 players this time? Would you guys (and gals) like to choose a specific setting for the next game? |
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 | Next newer thread | Next older thread |
| Jul - Display Case - Clue(do) | - - ![]() |
![]() |
Acmlmboard - commit 47be4dc [2021-08-23] ©2000-2022 Acmlm, Xkeeper, Kaito Sinclaire, et al. Warning: You are using TidyHTML mode! Pages MAY and probably WILL break. To disable, click here or append 'xxx-off=1' to the URL! ![]() |
| Query execution time: | 0.095521 seconds |
| Script execution time: | 0.034781 seconds |
| Total render time: | 0.130302 seconds |